CVE-2023-50348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHCL DRYiCE MyXalytics is impacted by an improper error handling vulnerability. The application returns detailed error messages that can provide an attacker with insight into the application, system, etc.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHCL DRYiCE MyXalytics contains an improper error handling vulnerability where the application returns overly detailed error messages to users. These verbose error messages can expose internal system information, file paths, stack traces, or configuration details that assist attackers in reconnaissance and further exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.9= 6.0= 6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed MyXalytics versionCheck the application documentation, installation directory, or product about page for the exact version number. Common locations include the installation folder or the application login page.Affected if The installed version is 5.9, 6.0, or 6.1 exactly.
-
Trigger an error conditionSubmit invalid input to the application such as malformed parameters, invalid credentials, or access a non-existent resource to induce an error response.Affected if The returned error page displays stack traces, file paths, internal system details, or detailed configuration information.
-
Check web server error configurationExamine the web server or application configuration files for settings related to error display, such as debug mode, stack trace enablement, or custom error handlers.Affected if Detailed error reporting or debug mode is enabled in the configuration.
-
Inspect HTTP response headersCapture and review HTTP responses from the application using browser developer tools or a proxy to examine the response body when errors occur.Affected if Responses contain verbose error messages, Java stack traces, or internal path information.
You are affected if the installed version is exactly 5.9, 6.0, or 6.1 AND the application returns detailed error messages with internal system information.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement custom error pages that display generic, user-friendly messages while logging detailed errors server-side. Disable detailed error reporting and stack trace display in production environments.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data