CVE-2023-51624
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DCS-8300LHV2 RTSP ValidateAuthorizationHeader Nonce Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP cameras. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Authorization header by the RTSP server, which listens on TCP port 554. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20072.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in the RTSP server's ValidateAuthorizationHeader function on D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP cameras. The flaw allows unauthenticated, network-adjacent attackers to overflow a fixed-length stack buffer via a malformed Authorization header and execute arbitrary code as root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.07.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is D-Link DCS-8300LHV2Access the camera's web interface or check the device label/metadata to verify the exact model numberAffected if The device is not a D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 model, then this CVE does not apply
-
Check installed firmware versionLog into the camera's web interface and navigate to the System or Settings page to view the firmware version, or use the manufacturer's discovery/tool to query the deviceAffected if Firmware version is below 1.07.02 (for example, 1.06.x or earlier)
-
Verify RTSP server is enabledCheck the camera's settings page for RTSP configuration, or scan TCP port 554 on the device to confirm the RTSP service is listeningAffected if RTSP server is enabled and port 554 is accessible on the network
-
Assess network exposureDetermine if the device is directly accessible from untrusted networks by checking NAT configurations, firewall rules, or VLAN placementAffected if The RTSP port (TCP 554) is reachable from network segments that include untrusted or adjacent attackers
A user is affected if they have a D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 camera running firmware below version 1.07.02 with RTSP enabled and accessible from a network-adjacent attacker position.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.07.02
Apply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise, implement network segmentation to restrict access to TCP port 554, as the device may be end-of-life with no patch.
Firmware version 1.07.02 or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 camera by accessing the web interface or using the D-Link app.
- 2. Navigate to the D-Link support website (support.dlink.com) and locate the DCS-8300LHV2 product page.
- 3. Download firmware version 1.07.02 or later from the official D-Link support page.
- 4. Access the camera's web management interface and navigate to the firmware upgrade section (typically under Settings > Maintenance > Firmware Upgrade).
- 5. Upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the upgrade process.
- 6. Wait for the upgrade to complete and the camera to reboot. Do not power off the device during the upgrade.
- 7. After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated to 1.07.02 or later.
- 8. Confirm the RTSP service is functioning normally after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51624 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51624 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data