CVE-2023-51625
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DCS-8300LHV2 ONVIF SetSystemDateAndTime Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP cameras. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the ONVIF API, which listens on TCP port 80. When parsing the sch:TZ XML element, the process does not properly validate a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21319.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP camera has a command injection vulnerability in its ONVIF API (TCP port 80). The sch:TZ XML element in SetSystemDateAndTime requests is not validated before being passed to a system call, allowing authenticated attackers (authentication can be bypassed) to execute arbitrary commands as root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.07.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is D-Link DCS-8300LHV2Affected if The device is a DCS-8300LHV2 model
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the camera web interface and navigate to Setup > System > Device Info, or check via ONVIF GetDeviceInformation request, and note the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is below 1.07.02 (for example, 1.06.01 or earlier)
-
Verify ONVIF service is accessibleCheck if TCP port 80 is open and responding to ONVIF requests by sending a GetCapabilities SOAP request to the deviceAffected if ONVIF service is exposed on port 80 and accepting requests
-
Confirm ONVIF authentication is activeAttempt to access the ONVIF API without credentials or with default credentials to verify if authentication can be bypassedAffected if ONVIF API is accessible without valid authentication or with weak/default credentials
You are affected if you have a D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 camera running firmware version below 1.07.02 with ONVIF service enabled and accessible on port 80, especially if ONVIF authentication can be bypassed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.07.02
Replace the affected D-Link camera with a currently-supported model from a vendor providing security updates, or network isolate the device and disable ONVIF if not required.
Firmware version 1.07.02 or later for D-Link DCS-8300LHV2
- Navigate to D-Link's official support website (supportannouncement.us.dlink.com) and download firmware version 1.07.02 or later for the DCS-8300LHV2 device
- Access the camera's web interface by entering the device IP address in a web browser
- Log into the camera's administration panel with administrator credentials
- Locate the firmware upgrade section in the settings menu (typically under 'Maintenance' or 'System' > 'Firmware Upgrade')
- Upload the downloaded firmware file (1.07.02 or later) and initiate the upgrade process
- Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete - do not power off the device during this process
- After the upgrade completes, the device will automatically restart
- Verify the firmware version has been updated by checking the device status page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51625 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data