CVE-2023-51628
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DCS-8300LHV2 ONVIF SetHostName Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP cameras. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetHostName ONVIF call. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21322.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the ONVIF SetHostName function of D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 IP cameras. The flaw results from insufficient length validation of user-supplied input before copying it into a fixed-size stack buffer, allowing authenticated attackers to overflow the buffer and achieve arbitrary code execution in the root context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.07.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is D-Link DCS-8300LHV2Access the camera's web interface or use ONVIF/SNMP discovery to verify the exact model number displayed in device informationAffected if The device is not a D-Link DCS-8300LHV2
-
Check firmware versionNavigate to the camera's web interface System > Device Info or use the ONVIF GetDeviceInformation request to retrieve the firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is below 1.07.02 (e.g., 1.06.01, 1.05.x, etc.)
-
Verify ONVIF service is enabledCheck the camera's web interface for ONVIF settings (usually under Network > ONVIF or similar) or use an ONVIF client to send a GetServices requestAffected if ONVIF protocol is enabled and accessible on the device
-
Confirm ONVIF authentication is configuredReview ONVIF user accounts in the camera's web interface under User Management or ONVIF user settingsAffected if ONVIF authentication is enabled (required for authenticated exploitation)
Device is affected if it is a D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 running firmware version below 1.07.02 with ONVIF functionality enabled and accessible with valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.07.02
Apply vendor firmware updates when available; meanwhile, isolate affected devices from untrusted networks and disable ONVIF functionality if not required, as the authentication bypass increases exploitability.
D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 Firmware version 1.07.02 or later
- 1. Download the firmware version 1.07.02 or later for D-Link DCS-8300LHV2 from the official D-Link support website
- 2. Access the camera's web management interface by entering the camera's IP address in a web browser
- 3. Log in with administrator credentials
- 4. Navigate to the Settings or Maintenance section of the web interface
- 5. Find the Firmware Upgrade or Software Update option
- 6. Select the downloaded firmware file (1.07.02 or later) and initiate the upgrade
- 7. Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete - do not power off the camera during this process
- 8. After the camera restarts, verify the firmware version has been updated to 1.07.02 or later in the system information page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51628 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51628 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data