CVE-2023-51642
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllegra loadFieldMatch Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Allegra. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, product implements a registration mechanism that can be used to create a user with a sufficient privilege level. The specific flaw exists within the loadFieldMatch method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of LOCAL SERVICE. Was ZDI-CAN-22506.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA deserialization vulnerability exists in Allegra's loadFieldMatch method where insufficient validation of user-supplied data allows remote attackers to deserialize untrusted data. Although authentication is required, the product's self-registration mechanism can create users with the necessary privileges, enabling authenticated RCE in the context of LOCAL SERVICE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Allegra versionLocate the Allegra application version through the admin interface (typically in About or System Info section), or check version metadata in the installation directoryAffected if Version is below 7.5.1 (any version < 7.5.1 is affected)
-
Verify self-registration mechanism statusAccess the system configuration or security settings in the Allegra admin panel and verify whether user self-registration is enabled for public usersAffected if Self-registration is enabled - this allows attackers to create accounts with the privileges needed to exploit the deserialization flaw
-
Confirm loadFieldMatch method accessibilityIdentify if the loadFieldMatch API endpoint or method is exposed and accessible to authenticated users through the web interface or APIAffected if The loadFieldMatch method is accessible to non-admin authenticated users
-
Audit user accounts for unauthorized registrationsReview the user management panel to list all registered accounts and check for any unexpected or unknown user accounts that may indicate exploitationAffected if Unexpected user accounts exist, especially those with elevated privileges
The environment is affected if Allegra version is below 7.5.1 and self-registration is enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create accounts and trigger the deserialization vulnerability in loadFieldMatch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.1
Implement strict input validation on the loadFieldMatch method to ensure only properly validated, expected data types are deserialized. Alternatively, disable the registration mechanism or enforce admin approval for new accounts to prevent unauthorized access.
Allegra version 7.5.1
- Identify current Allegra installation version
- Verify current version is below 7.5.1
- Backup the Allegra database and configuration files
- Download Allegra version 7.5.1 or later from the official vendor website (www.trackplus.com)
- Stop the Allegra service
- Install the version 7.5.1 update
- Restart the Allegra service
- Verify the application is functioning correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51642 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51642 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data