CVE-2023-7028
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.1 prior to 16.1.6, 16.2 prior to 16.2.9, 16.3 prior to 16.3.7, 16.4 prior to 16.4.5, 16.5 prior to 16.5.6, 16.6 prior to 16.6.4, and 16.7 prior to 16.7.2 in which user account password reset emails could be delivered to an unverified email address.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab CE/EE versions 16.1 through 16.7.x contained a vulnerability in the password reset mechanism where verification of email address ownership was not properly enforced, allowing password reset emails to be delivered to unverified email addresses. This enables account takeover if an attacker knows a username and has access to an unverified email address.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 16.2.0, < 16.2.9>= 16.3.0, < 16.3.7>= 16.4.0, < 16.4.5>= 16.5.0, < 16.5.6>= 16.6.0, < 16.6.4>= 16.7.0, < 16.7.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:version` or check the GitLab admin panel under Help > Version to determine the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 16.1.0 to 16.1.5, 16.2.0 to 16.2.8, 16.3.0 to 16.3.6, 16.4.0 to 16.4.4, 16.5.0 to 16.5.5, 16.6.0 to 16.6.3, or 16.7.0 to 16.7.1
-
Confirm password-based authentication is enabledAccess GitLab admin area under Settings > General > Sign-up restrictions and verify if password authentication is set to enabled for usersAffected if Password-based authentication is enabled in the GitLab instance settings
-
Verify user email verification settingsCheck the GitLab configuration file (gitlab.rb) for `gitlab_rails['gitlab_email_verification_enabled']` setting or inspect the admin panel under Settings > Preferences > Email settingsAffected if Email verification is disabled or not enforced for user accounts
Your environment is affected if you are running any GitLab version between 16.1.0 and 16.7.1 within the specified ranges and password-based authentication is enabled, allowing password reset emails to be sent to unverified email addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.1.616.2.916.3.7
Upgrade GitLab to version 16.1.6, 16.2.9, 16.3.7, 16.4.5, 16.5.6, 16.6.4, or 16.7.2 (or later) to patch the email verification bypass in the password reset flow.
16.1.6, 16.2.9, 16.3.7, 16.4.5, 16.5.6, 16.6.4, or 16.7.2 (choose the appropriate version for your upgrade path)
- Backup your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- Review GitLab's official upgrade documentation for your current version to ensure proper upgrade path
- Upgrade to one of the fixed releases: 16.1.6, 16.2.9, 16.3.7, 16.4.5, 16.5.6, 16.6.4, or 16.7.2
- For self-managed installations, follow the standard GitLab upgrade procedure (stop GitLab, install new packages, reconfigure, restart)
- After upgrade, verify that password reset emails are only sent to verified email addresses by testing the password reset flow
- Ensure all user email addresses in the system are properly verified going forward
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-7028 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-7028 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data