CVE-2024-10005
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in Consul and Consul Enterprise (“Consul”) such that using URL paths in L7 traffic intentions could bypass HTTP request path-based access rules.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Consul and Consul Enterprise, L7 traffic intentions that use URL paths can bypass HTTP request path-based access rules, allowing unauthorized access to resources that should be restricted by path-based controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.4.1, < 1.20.1>= 1.9.0, < 1.15.15>= 1.18.0, < 1.18.5>= 1.19.0, < 1.19.3= 1.20.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Consul versionRun `consul version` or inspect the Consul binary/version file, or query the `/v1/agent/self` API endpoint to retrieve the running versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges: >= 1.4.1 and < 1.20.1; >= 1.9.0 and < 1.15.15; >= 1.18.0 and < 1.18.5; >= 1.19.0 and < 1.19.3; or equals exactly 1.20.0
-
Identify L7 traffic intentionsQuery the Consul intention API with `consul intention list -detailed` or GET `/v1/agent/intentions` to list all configured traffic intentionsAffected if Any L7 traffic intentions exist in the Consul configuration
-
Check for path-based intention rulesExamine each L7 intention configuration using `consul intention get <name>` or GET `/v1/intention/<uuid>` and inspect the `Action`, `HTTPservers`, and `PathPrefix` or `PathExact` fieldsAffected if Any L7 intention specifies an HTTP path prefix or exact path match (PathPrefix, PathExact, or similar path-based criteria)
-
Verify intention source and destination servicesReview the L7 intentions to identify which source services can reach which destination services via HTTP paths, particularly intentions allowing traffic to sensitive servicesAffected if L7 path-based intentions reference sensitive backend services or APIs that should be protected by path-level access controls
You are affected if your Consul version is within the affected ranges AND you have L7 traffic intentions configured with HTTP path-based rules that could be bypassed through URL manipulation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.15.151.18.51.19.3
Review all L7 traffic intentions with path-based rules and ensure they properly enforce access controls; verify that path matching cannot be circumvented through URL manipulation.
Consul 1.20.1 (latest stable) or 1.19.3/1.18.5/1.15.15 depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify current Consul version using `consul --version`
- 2. Review current L7 traffic intention configurations to understand what path-based access rules are in place
- 3. Plan upgrade path based on current version - target the latest stable release in your current major version line
- 4. Backup Consul data and configuration files before upgrading
- 5. Test upgrade in non-production environment first
- 6. Upgrade Consul to one of the fixed versions: 1.20.1, 1.19.3, 1.18.5, or 1.15.15
- 7. Verify L7 traffic intentions are working correctly after upgrade
- 8. Confirm path-based access rules are properly enforced
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10005 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data