Ws Ftp ServerApplication · Progress

CVE-2024-1474

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.8.5 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In WS_FTP Server versions before 8.8.5, reflected cross-site scripting issues have been identified on various user supplied inputs on the WS_FTP Server administrative interface.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WS_FTP Server administrative interface allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through unsanitized user-supplied inputs, potentially compromising authenticated administrator sessions.

MitigationUpgrade to WS_FTP Server version 8.8.5 or later which contains the vendor patch addressing the reflected XSS issues.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ws Ftp ServerApplication
Affected:< 8.8.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WS_FTP Server version
    Locate the installed WS_FTP Server version through the administrative interface about page, installation directory metadata, or Windows Programs and Features. Compare the version number against the affected range (versions prior to 8.8.5).
    Affected if The installed version is below 8.8.5
  2. Determine admin interface exposure
    Verify if the WS_FTP Server administrative web interface is network-accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, IIS bindings, or reverse proxy configurations that expose port 8080 or 443 (default admin ports).
    Affected if The administrative interface is accessible from external or untrusted networks without proper network segmentation
  3. Review server logs for XSS patterns
    Examine WS_FTP Server HTTP access logs and IIS logs for suspicious request patterns containing script tags, javascript:, or other XSS vectors in URL parameters targeted at admin interface endpoints.
    Affected if Logs contain requests with XSS payloads directed at admin pages that may indicate exploitation attempts

The environment is affected if WS_FTP Server version is below 8.8.5 and the administrative interface is network-accessible, exposing authenticated administrators to reflected XSS attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.8.5 or later
Fixed in 8.8.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to WS_FTP Server version 8.8.5 or later which contains the vendor patch addressing the reflected XSS issues.

Recommended fix High confidence

8.8.5

  1. Download WS_FTP Server version 8.8.5 or later from the official Progress download portal
  2. Ensure you have a backup of your current configuration and data
  3. Stop the WS_FTP Server service before upgrading
  4. Run the installer for version 8.8.5 or later
  5. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number in the administrative interface
  7. Restart the WS_FTP Server service
  8. Test the administrative interface to confirm the XSS vulnerability is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ws Ftp Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1474 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data