CVE-2024-20264
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting crafted input into various data fields in an affected interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface, or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Firepower Management Center's web-based management interface. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code into various data fields due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to execute arbitrary script in the context of the victim's browser session or access sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 7.1.0= 7.1.0.1= 7.1.0.2= 7.1.0.3= 7.2.0= 7.2.0.1= 7.2.1= 7.2.2= 7.2.3= 7.2.3.1= 7.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco FMC presenceAccess the web-based management interface URL (typically https://<FMC-hostname>/) and verify the Cisco Firepower logo and login page appears. Alternatively, check network inventory for devices running Cisco Firepower Management Center software.Affected if The system is running Cisco Firepower Management Center web interface and the version is not known to be fixed.
-
Check FMC software versionLog into the Cisco FMC web interface and navigate to System > About > Updates, or use the CLI command 'show version' on the FMC appliance. Record the software version number displayed.Affected if The installed version matches any of these affected versions: 7.1.0, 7.1.0.1, 7.1.0.2, 7.1.0.3, 7.2.0, 7.2.0.1, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.3.1, or 7.2.4.
-
Verify web interface accessibilityConfirm the FMC web management interface is reachable from network locations. Check firewall rules, access policies, and interface configurations to determine if the interface is exposed to users beyond the local console.Affected if The web-based management interface is accessible over the network (not restricted to localhost or console-only access) on versions 7.1.0 through 7.2.4.
-
Inspect for stored XSS in data fieldsAs an administrator, review the following web interface sections where data input occurs: Device > Device Management (device names, descriptions), Object Manager (custom objects), Policies > Access Control (rule names, comments), and System > Users (user profile fields). Look for any unexpected script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or suspicious encoded characters in existing records.Affected if Any data field in these management sections contains unescaped HTML script tags or JavaScript code that could execute in a browser.
A user is affected if Cisco Firepower Management Center is running any version from 7.1.0 through 7.2.4 and its web-based management interface is accessible to authenticated users who can input data into the affected fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied security patches for Cisco FMC Software. Until patches are applied, limit administrative access to the interface and monitor for unusual activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20264 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20264 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data