CVE-2024-20374
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with Administrator-level privileges to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of certain HTTP request parameters that are sent to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the Cisco FMC web-based management interface and sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands as the root user on the affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need Administrator-level credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco Secure Firewall Management Center contains a command injection vulnerability in its web-based management interface due to insufficient validation of HTTP request parameters. An authenticated attacker with Administrator privileges can send crafted HTTP requests to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.7.0= 6.7.0.1= 6.7.0.2= 6.7.0.3= 7.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.2.1= 7.0.3= 7.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product is Cisco Secure Firewall Management CenterIdentify the installed product by checking the system inventory or running 'show version' on the device. This vulnerability affects only the FMC, not other Cisco security products.Affected if The device is not a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center instance.
-
Check FMC version numberAccess the FMC web interface and navigate to Help > About, or run 'show version' via CLI to obtain the exact software version number.Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 6.7.0, 6.7.0.1, 6.7.0.2, 6.7.0.3, 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.2.1, 7.0.3, or 7.0.4.
-
Verify web-based management interface is enabledCheck if the FMC web UI is accessible and running. This can be confirmed by attempting to reach the FMC HTTPS interface or reviewing the httpd service status via CLI with 'show running-config | include http'Affected if The FMC web-based management interface is exposed and accessible.
-
Review Administrator accounts for unauthorized changesLog into the FMC web interface and navigate to System > Users > Administrators to review all Administrator-level accounts. Check for any unexpected or unauthorized administrator accounts that may indicate prior exploitation.Affected if New or unrecognized Administrator accounts exist that were not created by your organization.
-
Inspect system logs for suspicious command executionReview FMC logs under System > Logs > Audit and search for unusual or unexpected CLI commands, particularly those executed via the web interface that involve shell execution or system-level operations.Affected if Audit logs show unexpected commands or API calls that were not initiated by legitimate administrators.
You are affected if the device is a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center running any of the listed versions with its web management interface accessible to an authenticated administrator.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patch when available; restrict access to the FMC web management interface to trusted networks and enforce strong Administrator credentials to reduce exploitability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20374 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20374 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data