CVE-2024-20473
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks on an affected system. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not validate user input adequately. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the application as an Administrator and sending crafted SQL queries to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain unauthorized data from the database and make changes to the system. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need Administrator-level privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center web-based management interface due to insufficient user input validation. An authenticated attacker with Administrator privileges can send crafted SQL queries to exfiltrate unauthorized data and modify system settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.3.0= 7.3.1= 7.3.1.1= 7.3.1.2= 7.4.0= 7.4.1= 7.4.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center versionLog into the management center web interface and navigate to the Help > About page, or run 'show version' via CLIAffected if Version displayed is 7.3.0, 7.3.1, 7.3.1.1, 7.3.1.2, 7.4.0, 7.4.1, or 7.4.1.1
-
Confirm web-based management interface is enabledCheck management center access settings via the web interface under System > Configuration > Management Access, or review interface bindings in the device configurationAffected if The web-based management interface (HTTPS/HTTP) is enabled and accessible on any management IP
-
Verify Administrator accounts existAccess the Users/Administrators section in the web interface under System > Users > Users, or use CLI command 'show user' to list configured usersAffected if Any Administrator-level user account is configured in the system
-
Check for unusual SQL-related log entriesReview system logs under Monitoring > Logs > System, filtering for SQL syntax patterns or database errors, particularly from management interface sourcesAffected if Logs show unexpected SQL syntax in queries or database errors originating from the web management interface
The environment is affected if the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center runs any of the listed versions AND the web-based management interface is accessible with Administrator accounts configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco's patch when available and enforce least-privilege principles for Administrator accounts; monitor for unauthorized database queries in logs.
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center 7.4.0 or later releases, or 7.3.1.3 and later maintenance releases within the 7.3 branch
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center by accessing the web-based management interface and checking the System > Updates > Product Updates page
- 2. Download the fixed version from Cisco's software download center at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com or cisco.com downloads
- 3. Back up the current FMC configuration via the web interface (System > Tools > Backup/Restore)
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may cause temporary disruption
- 5. Upload the upgrade package to the FMC via the web interface (System > Tools > Software Update)
- 6. Follow Cisco's standard upgrade procedure documented in the FMC migration and upgrade guides
- 7. After upgrade, verify the system is functioning correctly and the SQL injection vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20473 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20473 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data