CVE-2024-20498
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco AnyConnect VPN server of Cisco Meraki MX and Cisco Meraki Z Series Teleworker Gateway devices could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition in the AnyConnect service on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of client-supplied parameters while establishing an SSL VPN session. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a crafted HTTPS request to the VPN server of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Cisco AnyConnect VPN server to restart, resulting in the failure of the established SSL VPN connections and forcing remote users to initiate a new VPN connection and reauthenticate. A sustained attack could prevent new SSL VPN connections from being established. Note: When the attack traffic stops, the Cisco AnyConnect VPN server recovers gracefully without requiring manual intervention.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco AnyConnect VPN server on Cisco Meraki MX and Z Series Teleworker Gateway devices allow unauthenticated remote attackers to send crafted HTTPS requests with insufficiently validated client-supplied parameters during SSL VPN session establishment, causing the VPN server to restart and terminate active connections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.6.0, < 18.211.2>= 17.6.0, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2>= 16.2, < 18.211.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Meraki device modelLog into the Meraki dashboard or check the device label to confirm the model number is MX64, MX65, Z3, Z3c, Z4, Z4c, VMX, or MX600Affected if The device model is not in this list, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the Meraki dashboard, navigate to Network-wide > Monitor > Appliance status, or use the API call GET /devices/{serial} to retrieve the firmware version fieldAffected if The firmware version is greater than or equal to 16.2 (or 17.6.0 for MX64/MX65) AND less than 18.211.2
-
Verify SSL VPN is enabledIn the Meraki dashboard, go to Security & SD-WAN > Client VPN, or check via API: GET /networks/{networkId}/clientVpnAffected if Client VPN (AnyConnect) is not enabled, the vulnerability cannot be triggered even on a vulnerable version
A device is affected if it is an MX64, MX65, Z3, Z3c, Z4, Z4c, VMX, or MX600 running firmware version 16.2 or higher (or 17.6.0+ for MX64/MX65) but below 18.211.2, AND has Client VPN enabled
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.211.2
Apply vendor-provided patches from Cisco/Meraki for the affected MX and Z Series devices. Until patches are available, consider network-level mitigations such as rate limiting on VPN endpoints or restricting VPN access to known IP ranges.
Firmware version 18.211.2 or later for all affected Meraki MX and Z Series devices
- 1. Log into the Meraki Dashboard and navigate to the affected device (MX or Z Series).
- 2. Navigate to the device's Firmware section in Settings.
- 3. Check the current firmware version to confirm it is affected (less than 18.211.2).
- 4. In the Firmware upgrade settings, select the 'Specific version' option and choose version 18.211.2 or later.
- 5. Click 'Save' and then 'Apply' to initiate the firmware upgrade.
- 6. Wait for the upgrade to complete and verify the new firmware version is 18.211.2 or higher.
- 7. Test SSL VPN functionality to confirm the AnyConnect VPN server is operating normally.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20498 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20498 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data