CVE-2024-20520
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV042, RV042G, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, Administrator-level, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have valid Administrator credentials on the affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system as the root user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated RCE vulnerability in Cisco Small Business RV042/RV042G/RV320/RV325 router web management interface. Improper validation of user-supplied input allows an attacker with Administrator credentials to execute arbitrary code as root user on the underlying OS via crafted HTTP requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tmCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify router modelAccess the web-based management interface and check the device model in the Status or System Summary page, or inspect the physical device labelAffected if Model is RV042, RV042G, RV320, or RV325
-
Check firmware versionIn the web interface, navigate to Status > System Summary or similar to view the firmware version. The version is typically displayed as a string like 1.3.1.10Affected if Router model is one of the affected models
-
Compare version to affected listCompare your installed firmware version against these affected versions: 1.0.1.17, 1.0.2.03, 1.1.0.09, 1.1.1.06, 1.1.1.19, 1.2.1.13, 1.2.1.14, 1.3.1.10, 1.3.1.12, 1.3.2.02, 1.3.12.6-tm, 1.3.12.19-tmAffected if Installed firmware version exactly matches one of the listed versions
-
Verify web management interface is enabledCheck if the HTTP/HTTPS web management interface is accessible by navigating to the router's IP address in a browserAffected if Web interface is accessible and you can reach the login page
-
Confirm Administrator access existsVerify that Administrator-level credentials are configured or can be obtained for the deviceAffected if An Administrator account exists on the device
You are affected if you have a RV042/RV042G/RV320/RV325 router running any of the firmware versions exactly matching 1.0.1.17 through 1.3.12.19-tm, with the web management interface exposed and Administrator credentials accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict web management interface access to trusted networks only; apply Cisco firmware updates when available; enforce strong Administrator credentials and monitor for anomalous HTTP requests.
Fixed firmware version available from Cisco security advisory (obtain from sec.cloudapps.cisco.com)
- 1. Check Cisco's official security advisory for CVE-2024-20520 at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com to obtain the specific fixed firmware version
- 2. Identify the exact router model (RV042, RV042G, RV320, or RV325) from the affected device
- 3. Download the fixed firmware version from Cisco's support portal
- 4. Back up the current router configuration
- 5. Access the router's web-based management interface
- 6. Navigate to the Administration or System Management section
- 7. Use the firmware update functionality to upload and install the fixed firmware version
- 8. After reboot, verify the firmware version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20520 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20520 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data