CVE-2024-20524
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV042, RV042G, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, Administrator-level, remote attacker to cause an unexpected reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to have valid Administrator credentials on the affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user input that is in incoming HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface of the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause an unexpected reload of the device, resulting in a DoS condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper validation of user input in incoming HTTP packets on the web-based management interface allows an authenticated Administrator-level attacker to send crafted HTTP requests that cause an unexpected device reload, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tm= 1.0.1.17= 1.0.2.03= 1.1.0.09= 1.1.1.06= 1.1.1.19= 1.2.1.13= 1.2.1.14= 1.3.1.10= 1.3.1.12= 1.3.2.02= 1.3.12.6-tm= 1.3.12.19-tmCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the device web interface or console and locate the model number (Rv042, Rv042g, Rv320, or Rv325) in the status or system information pageAffected if Device model is Cisco Rv042, Rv042g, Rv320, or Rv325
-
Check installed firmware versionIn the web interface, go to Status or System Summary page and record the firmware version shown (for example: 1.3.2.02, 1.3.12.19-tm)Affected if Firmware version exactly matches one of: 1.0.1.17, 1.0.2.03, 1.1.0.09, 1.1.1.06, 1.1.1.19, 1.2.1.13, 1.2.1.14, 1.3.1.10, 1.3.1.12, 1.3.2.02, 1.3.12.6-tm, or 1.3.12.19-tm
-
Confirm web-based management is enabledIn the web interface, go to Administration or Management settings and verify that HTTP or HTTPS web management access is enabledAffected if Web-based management interface is enabled and accessible
-
Verify administrator account existsCheck user management or administration page to confirm at least one Administrator-level account is configured on the deviceAffected if An Administrator-level account is present (required for the attack vector)
Device is affected if it is a Cisco Rv042/Rv042g/Rv320/Rv325 running any of the listed firmware versions with web-based management enabled and an administrator account configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict web-based management interface access to trusted networks or VPN, change default Administrator credentials, and apply the vendor-supplied firmware patch when available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20524 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20524 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data