CVE-2024-20718
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.6-p3, 2.4.5-p5, 2.4.4-p6 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to trick a victim into performing actions they did not intend to do, which could be used to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, typically in the form of the victim clicking a link or visiting a malicious website.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Commerce contains a CSRF vulnerability in versions 2.4.6-p3, 2.4.5-p5, 2.4.4-p6 and earlier that allows attackers to forge requests by tricking authenticated administrators into clicking malicious links or visiting attacker-controlled sites, potentially bypassing security controls and performing unauthorized actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Commerce versionRun the command bin/magento --version or check composer.json for the magento/product-community-edition version entryAffected if The installed version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, or any version earlier than 2.4.4-p6, 2.4.5-p5, or 2.4.6-p3
-
Confirm admin panel is accessibleVerify that the /admin or custom admin URL is reachable and authentication is enabled in the deploymentAffected if The admin panel is exposed and accessible to users who could be tricked into clicking malicious links
-
Verify CSRF token protection on admin formsInspect page source of admin forms (e.g., customer create, product edit) to check for form_key or similar CSRF token input fieldsAffected if State-changing admin forms lack CSRF token validation (form_key parameter missing or not validated on submission)
-
Check SameSite cookie configurationReview app/etc/env.php for session cookie settings or inspect browser cookies for the admin session to verify SameSite and Secure flagsAffected if Session cookies lack SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes, allowing cross-site requests
You are affected if running Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.4 through 2.4.6 (or earlier than 2.4.4-p6/2.4.5-p5/2.4.6-p3) with an accessible admin panel and missing CSRF protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor security patch from Adobe immediately. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations and configure SameSite attributes on session cookies to prevent cross-site request forgery.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.7 (latest stable release) or version-specific patch releases: 2.4.4-p7, 2.4.5-p6, 2.4.6-p4
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce version and patch level (e.g., 2.4.4-p5, 2.4.5-p4, 2.4.6-p2).
- 2. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4-p6 and earlier: upgrade to 2.4.4-p7 or later, preferably 2.4.7 or latest stable release.
- 3. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5-p5 and earlier: upgrade to 2.4.5-p6 or later, preferably 2.4.7 or latest stable release.
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6-p3 and earlier: upgrade to 2.4.6-p4 or later, preferably 2.4.7 or latest stable release.
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production.
- 6. Verify the CSRF protection is functioning after upgrade by reviewing Adobe security release notes.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20718 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20718 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data