Node.jsApplication

CVE-2024-21891

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 20.11.1 / 21.6.2 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Node.js depends on multiple built-in utility functions to normalize paths provided to node:fs functions, which can be overwitten with user-defined implementations leading to filesystem permission model bypass through path traversal attack. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20 and Node.js 21. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Node.js contains vulnerable path normalization functions that can be overwritten by user-defined implementations. When the experimental permission model is enabled in Node.js 20 or 21, this allows attackers to bypass filesystem access controls via path traversal, potentially reading or writing files outside permitted directories.

MitigationUpgrade Node.js to a patched version once available. Until then, avoid using the experimental permission model in production or ensure untrusted code cannot define custom path utilities.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Node.jsApplication
Affected:>= 20.0.0, < 20.11.1>= 21.0.0, < 21.6.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Node.js version
    Run 'node --version' or 'node -p process.version' to get the exact version
    Affected if Version is >= 20.0.0 and < 20.11.1, or >= 21.0.0 and < 21.6.2
  2. Verify experimental permission model is not enabled
    Check Node.js startup flags and runtime configuration for --experimental-permission flag or process.permission.enabled() returns true
    Affected if The experimental permission model is actively enabled in your Node.js runtime
  3. Inspect process launch commands
    Review startup scripts, systemd units, container entrypoints, or process managers for --experimental-permission flag
    Affected if Any launch configuration includes --experimental-permission

You are affected if your Node.js version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the experimental permission model is enabled, as the path traversal bypass requires both conditions to be exploitable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 20.11.1 / 21.6.2 or later
Fixed in 20.11.121.6.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Node.js to a patched version once available. Until then, avoid using the experimental permission model in production or ensure untrusted code cannot define custom path utilities.

Recommended fix High confidence

Node.js 20.11.1+ or Node.js 21.6.2+

  1. Check current Node.js version by running `node --version`
  2. If running Node.js 20.x (>= 20.0.0 and < 20.11.1) or Node.js 21.x (>= 21.0.0 and < 21.6.2), upgrade to a fixed release
  3. For Node.js 20.x users: upgrade to Node.js 20.11.1 or later
  4. For Node.js 21.x users: upgrade to Node.js 21.6.2 or later
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `node --version`
Caveat Review Node.js changelog for any other changes between your current version and the target version; this vulnerability only affects users with the experimental permission model enabled

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Node.js Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21891 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21891 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data