CVE-2024-22430
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.6.0.x contains an incorrect default permissions vulnerability. A local low privileges malicious user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.6.0.x contains incorrect default permissions that allow a low-privilege local user to potentially cause denial of service. The vulnerability stems from overly permissive default settings on system files or directories that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.2.0, < 9.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PowerScale OneFS versionRun `isi version` or access the OneFS web admin interface under Cluster > Management > Cluster Identity to view the installed versionAffected if Installed version is greater than or equal to 8.2.0 and less than 9.6.1
-
Check system directory permissionsUse `ls -la` or `icacls` (Windows) to examine permissions on critical OneFS directories such as /ifs, /var, /opt, and system configuration directoriesAffected if Any critical system directories or files are world-readable, world-writable, or have overly permissive access controls that allow low-privilege users read/write access
-
Verify low-privilege user access to system filesCreate or use a test low-privilege local user account and attempt to read or modify files in system directories that should be restrictedAffected if Low-privilege users can access, read, or modify files in directories that should be restricted to administrative or system-only access
-
Review ACLs on system binaries and configurationsExamine access control lists on key system binaries, configuration files, and scripts in directories like /usr/local, /etc, and OneFS-specific paths using `getfacl` or equivalentAffected if Executable binaries or configuration files have permissions allowing modification by non-privileged users
A user is affected if their OneFS version falls within 8.2.0 to 9.6.0.x AND the system contains overly permissive default permissions that permit low-privilege users to access or modify restricted system resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.6.1
Review and correct default file/directory permissions on the OneFS system, ensuring low-privilege users cannot access or modify critical system resources. Apply vendor patches when available or implement compensating controls to restrict access to sensitive system components.
OneFS 9.6.1 or later
- Verify current OneFS version using 'isi version' or through the web administration console
- Review Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade documentation for your current version
- Schedule an appropriate maintenance window for the upgrade
- Download the OneFS 9.6.1 (or later) upgrade package from Dell support portal
- Follow Dell's documented upgrade procedure for PowerScale OneFS, which typically includes: backing up configuration, running the upgrade installer, and validating cluster health post-upgrade
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the version shows 9.6.1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-22430 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-22430 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data