CVE-2024-23673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMalicious code execution via path traversal in Apache Software Foundation Apache Sling Servlets Resolver.This issue affects all version of Apache Sling Servlets Resolver before 2.11.0. However, whether a system is vulnerable to this attack depends on the exact configuration of the system. If the system is vulnerable, a user with write access to the repository might be able to trick the Sling Servlet Resolver to load a previously uploaded script. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.11.0, which fixes this issue. It is recommended to upgrade, regardless of whether your system configuration currently allows this attack or not.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Apache Sling Servlets Resolver allows authenticated users with write access to the repository to potentially load and execute previously uploaded malicious scripts. The vulnerability exists in all versions before 2.11.0 and its exploitability depends on system configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Sling Servlets Resolver versionCheck the OSGi bundle version of the 'org.apache.sling.servlets.resolver' bundle through the Apache Felix Web Console (System Information > OSGi > Bundles) or query the bundle using the OSGi console command 'inspect.capability org.apache.sling.bundleresource.name'Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.11.0
-
Verify script resolver path configurationInspect the Servlets Resolver configuration in the Apache Felix Web Console (Configuration > Apache Sling Servlets Resolver) or check the 'org.apache.sling.servlets.resolver' configuration file in the 'sling' directory. Look for properties controlling script search paths and execution permissions.Affected if The resolver is configured to load scripts from paths accessible to authenticated users with write access
-
Confirm authenticated user write accessReview user permissions in the Apache Sling Repository (Jackrabbit) by checking the ACLs for the /apps or /libs paths where scripts are stored. Use the Repository Explorer or query the /rep:ACL node for user permissions.Affected if Authenticated users have write access to script storage locations such as /apps or /libs directories in the repository
-
Check for uploaded script executionExamine the repository for any non-standard scripts in /apps, /libs, or other script search paths configured in the Servlets Resolver. Use the resource browser or repository query to list scripts.Affected if Scripts exist in writable locations that the resolver is configured to execute
You are affected if the installed Apache Sling Servlets Resolver version is below 2.11.0 AND the system is configured to allow authenticated users with write access to load scripts from user-writable repository paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.0
Upgrade to Apache Sling Servlets Resolver version 2.11.0 or later. Regardless of current configuration, the upgrade is strongly recommended to eliminate the vulnerability.
Apache Sling Servlets Resolver 2.11.0
- 1. Identify the current version of Apache Sling Servlets Resolver in your project dependencies
- 2. Locate the dependency management file (pom.xml, build.gradle, or similar)
- 3. Update the Apache Sling Servlets Resolver dependency version to 2.11.0
- 4. Rebuild and test the application to ensure the upgrade doesn't break existing functionality
- 5. Deploy the updated application to your environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data