CVE-2024-25959
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.4.0.x through 9.7.0.x contains an insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerability. A low privileged local attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to sensitive information disclosure, escalation of privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions 9.4.0.x through 9.7.0.x contains a vulnerability where sensitive information is written to log files. A low-privileged local attacker with filesystem access can potentially read these logs to obtain sensitive data and escalate privileges to higher permission levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.0.17>= 9.5.0.0, < 9.5.0.8>= 9.6.1, < 9.7.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed OneFS versionRun the command 'isi version' or 'isi status' on the PowerScale system CLI to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The version falls within 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.16, 9.5.0.0 through 9.5.0.7, or 9.6.1 through 9.7.0.1
-
Review log file permissionsUse 'ls -la' on log directories such as /var/log/, /ifs/*/logs/, or the platform log location to check who can read log filesAffected if Log files or directories are readable by non-administrative users or have overly permissive access controls
-
Inspect log contents for sensitive dataSearch log files using 'grep' or a text viewer for patterns that may indicate exposed credentials, passwords, tokens, or API keys written in plain textAffected if Log files contain sensitive information such as plaintext passwords, authentication tokens, or credential data that should not be logged
-
Check for low-privileged local accountsReview local user accounts on the system using 'isi auth' commands or user management tools to identify accounts with limited permissionsAffected if Low-privileged local accounts exist and have filesystem access to log directories where sensitive data may be written
A system is affected if it runs OneFS version 9.4.0.0-9.4.0.16, 9.5.0.0-9.5.0.7, or 9.6.1-9.7.0.1 and log files containing sensitive data are accessible to low-privileged local users with filesystem access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.0.179.5.0.89.7.0.2
Upgrade to a version beyond 9.7.0.x or apply Dell-supplied security patches. Until patched, limit local access to the system and restrict filesystem permissions on log directories.
9.7.0.2 (or branch-specific: 9.4.0.17+, 9.5.0.8+)
- 1. Identify current OneFS version using 'isi version' command or via the web administration UI
- 2. Create a complete backup of the OneFS configuration and ensure data is protected
- 3. Review Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade compatibility matrix and release notes for the target version
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed version from Dell Support: 9.4.0.17 or later for 9.4.x branch, 9.5.0.8 or later for 9.5.x branch, or 9.7.0.2 or later for 9.6.x/9.7.x branch
- 5. Plan maintenance window as OneFS upgrades may require cluster downtime
- 6. Follow Dell official OneFS upgrade procedure documentation to apply the patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25959 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data