CVE-2024-25970
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.7.0.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to loss of integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.7.0.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A low privileged remote attacker with network access could exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted input to the affected system, potentially leading to loss of integrity through unauthorized data modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.2.0, <= 9.3.0>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.0.18>= 9.5.0.0, < 9.5.0.8>= 9.6.0, <= 9.7.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the PowerScale OneFS versionRun 'isi version' or check the OneFS web console login page footer for the version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 8.2.0 to 9.3.0 (all versions), 9.4.0 to 9.4.0.17, 9.5.0.0 to 9.5.0.7, or 9.6.0 to 9.7.0.1
-
Verify network accessibility of OneFS management interfacesAttempt to reach the OneFS web interface (port 8080 or 443) or API endpoints from an untrusted network segmentAffected if The OneFS management interface (web UI or API) is accessible from a network where low-privileged users can send requests
-
Confirm presence of low-privileged user accountsCheck for user accounts with limited privileges using 'isi auth users list' or review user directory integration settingsAffected if Low-privileged user accounts exist that can authenticate to the OneFS network interfaces
-
Identify exposed API or input vectorsReview which OneFS services are network-accessible by checking 'isi network interfaces' and reviewing firewall or access zone configurationsAffected if Network-accessible services accept user-supplied input that could contain specially crafted requests
The environment is affected if the installed OneFS version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the management interface is network-accessible to low-privileged users who can send specially crafted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.0.189.5.0.8
Apply the vendor-provided security patch for Dell PowerScale OneFS to address the improper input validation vulnerability. If a patch is unavailable, implement network segmentation to limit access to the OneFS management interfaces and enforce principle of least privilege for user accounts.
9.4.0.18 or later for 9.4.x line; 9.5.0.8 or later for 9.5.x line; latest 9.7.x or 9.8.x for 9.6-9.7.x lines
- Identify the current PowerScale OneFS version using 'isi version' or through the web admin console
- Determine the appropriate target version based on current installation: for 9.4.x lines upgrade to 9.4.0.18 or later, for 9.5.x upgrade to 9.5.0.8 or later, for 9.6.x-9.7.x upgrade to the latest available version (9.7.0.2 or newer)
- Review Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade prerequisites and compatibility documentation
- Create a backup of the current configuration
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Follow Dell's documented upgrade procedure for PowerScale OneFS, typically via ISI management console or CLI
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the vulnerability is resolved by checking the OneFS version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25970 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25970 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data