CVE-2024-29170
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.8.0.x contain a use of hard coded credentials vulnerability. An adjacent network unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure of network traffic and denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.x through 9.8.0.x contain hardcoded credentials embedded in the firmware or configuration. An adjacent network attacker who can reach the system can use these credentials to authenticate without valid user credentials, leading to interception of network traffic and potential denial of service by abusing the gained access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.2.0, <= 9.8.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine PowerScale OneFS versionRun 'isi version' or check the system management interface for the installed OneFS version numberAffected if The installed version falls within 8.2.0 through 9.8.0.0 (inclusive)
-
Identify hardcoded credentials in configurationReview firmware configuration files and embedded credential storage locations for any static or default credentials that appear hardcoded rather than dynamically generatedAffected if Any hardcoded credentials are found embedded in firmware or configuration files
-
Check authentication configurationExamine the authentication and access control configuration to determine if the vulnerable credential-based authentication pathway is enabledAffected if The authentication method using the hardcoded credentials is active and accessible
-
Assess network accessibilityVerify whether the management interface or authentication service is reachable from adjacent network segmentsAffected if The system is network-accessible to adjacent attackers who could reach the authentication interface
You are affected if your PowerScale OneFS version is 8.2.0 through 9.8.0.0 and hardcoded credentials exist in your firmware or configuration that could be used for unauthenticated access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace hardcoded credentials with dynamically generated, unique credentials. Dell has released updates for affected versions; upgrade to a patched version or follow vendor guidance for credential rotation if patches are not immediately applicable.
Upgrade to a version newer than 9.8.0.0 (contact Dell for the specific fixed release)
- Contact Dell Support or visit dell.com/support to obtain the specific security patch or updated version for PowerScale OneFS.
- Review the Dell PowerScale OneFS upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version.
- Schedule a maintenance window - upgrades may require downtime and should be performed during planned maintenance periods.
- Back up critical data and configuration before initiating the upgrade.
- Follow Dell's documented upgrade procedure for PowerScale OneFS, which typically involves using the 'isi升级' or similar upgrade utility.
- After upgrade, verify the system is running the patched version and confirm the hard-coded credentials vulnerability is resolved.
- Review audit logs for any signs of exploitation prior to patching.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29170 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29170 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data