Powerscale OnefsApplication · Dell

CVE-2024-32854

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.5.1.0 / 9.7.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privilege attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to privilege escalation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability allowing a local high-privilege attacker to escalate privileges. The vulnerability requires local system access and involves flaws in how OneFS manages elevated privileges.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch for Dell PowerScale OneFS when available. Until then, restrict local access to the system to trusted, authorized administrators only and monitor for unusual privilege escalation activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Powerscale OnefsApplication
Affected:= 9.8.0.0>= 8.2.2, < 9.5.1.0>= 9.6.0, < 9.7.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed PowerScale OneFS version
    Run 'isi version' or check the OneFS web interface under Access > About to retrieve the exact version number
    Affected if The version matches = 9.8.0.0 OR falls within >= 8.2.2 and < 9.5.1.0 OR >= 9.6.0 and < 9.7.1.0
  2. Verify local administrative accounts exist
    Run 'isi auth users list' or check /etc/passwd for local user accounts with elevated group memberships (wheel, admin, or equivalent privileged groups)
    Affected if Local user accounts with privileged group memberships are present on the system
  3. Check for unauthorized privilege escalation events
    Review OneFS audit logs under /var/log/ for privilege-related events, or run 'isi audit' commands to search for unexpected privilege changes or role modifications
    Affected if Audit logs show unexpected role changes, privilege escalations, or modifications to user permissions that were not initiated by authorized administrators

You are affected if your OneFS version falls within 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 (specifically = 9.8.0.0, >= 8.2.2 and < 9.5.1.0, or >= 9.6.0 and < 9.7.1.0) and you have local user accounts that could be exploited by a high-privilege local attacker.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.5.1.0 / 9.7.1.0 or later
Fixed in 9.5.1.09.7.1.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch for Dell PowerScale OneFS when available. Until then, restrict local access to the system to trusted, authorized administrators only and monitor for unusual privilege escalation activity.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

OneFS 9.8.0.1 or later stable release (check Dell support for exact fixed version)

  1. 1. Identify the current PowerScale OneFS version by running 'isi version' or checking the web管理界面
  2. 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade (ensure adequate backup and cluster health)
  3. 3. Download the patched OneFS release from Dell Support (www.dell.com/support) - look for the security fix addressing CVE-2024-32854
  4. 4. For cluster upgrades, use 'isi upgrade' command or the OneFS web UI under Cluster Management > Upgrade
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade completes successfully and the new version is >= 9.8.0.1 or the next stable release
  6. 6. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking 'isi security CVE' or the Dell Security Advisory for this CVE
Caveat Review Dell OneFS upgrade guide for compatibility requirements and ensure cluster is in healthy state before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Powerscale Onefs Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32854 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32854 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data