CVE-2024-33501
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTwo improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability [CWE-89] in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5, FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5 and FortiAnalyzer-BigData version 7.4.0 and before 7.2.7 allows a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted CLI requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, and FortiAnalyzer-BigData allows a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted CLI requests. The flaw exists in the CLI interface where user input is improperly neutralized before being used in SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.2.6>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3>= 6.4.5, < 7.2.8= 7.4.0>= 6.0.10, <= 6.0.12>= 6.2.8, < 7.2.6>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Fortinet productRun 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system status' via CLI, or check the web UI dashboard for the product nameAffected if The product is FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer-BigData, or FortiManager
-
Determine the installed versionRun 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system status' via CLI to display the firmware version numberAffected if The version falls within: FortiAnalyzer >= 6.4.0 and < 7.2.6, or >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.3; FortiAnalyzer-BigData >= 6.4.5 and < 7.2.8, or = 7.4.0; FortiManager >= 6.0.10 through 6.0.12, >= 6.2.8 and < 7.2.6, or >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.3
-
Verify CLI interface accessibilityConfirm that CLI access is enabled via 'show system interface' and check that admin accounts have CLI privileges in 'show system admin'Affected if CLI access is permitted to any admin or privileged user account
-
Review admin user privilegesExecute 'show system admin' to list admin accounts and their privilege levelsAffected if Multiple admin accounts or service accounts with privileged access exist
-
Inspect CLI command logs for suspicious activityCheck log outputs for unusual SQL-like commands or abnormal CLI query patterns in the event log orfortiAnalyzer/FortiManager logsAffected if Logs contain unexpected or malformed SQL commands issued via CLI interface
Your environment is affected if you are running FortiAnalyzer, FortiAnalyzer-BigData, or FortiManager with a version matching the affected ranges and the CLI interface is accessible to privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.2.67.2.87.4.3
Apply Fortinet security patches: upgrade to FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager 7.4.3 or later (or 7.2.5+), and FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.2.7 or later. Until patched, strictly limit CLI access to trusted privileged users only and monitor for suspicious CLI activity.
FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to 7.2.6 or 7.4.3; FortiAnalyzer Big Data: upgrade to 7.2.8 or 7.4.1; FortiManager: upgrade to 7.2.6 or 7.4.3
- 1. Identify the exact FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager version currently installed using: `get system status` or `fnmsys` command
- 2. For FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to version 7.2.6 or later (if on 7.2.x branch), or 7.4.3 or later (if on 7.4.x branch)
- 3. For FortiAnalyzer Big Data: upgrade to version 7.2.8 or later (if on 7.2.x branch), or 7.4.1 or later (if on 7.4.x branch)
- 4. For FortiManager: upgrade to version 7.2.6 or later (if on 7.2.x branch), or 7.4.3 or later (if on 7.4.x branch)
- 5. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 6. Upload the firmware to the device via Web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI: `execute restore config` or `execute upgrade`
- 7. Reboot the device after upgrade completes
- 8. Verify the new version is installed: `get system status`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-33501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-33501 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data