CVE-2024-34103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7, 2.4.6-p5, 2.4.5-p7, 2.4.4-p8 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authentication vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access or elevated privileges within the application. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, but attack complexity is high.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7, 2.4.6-p5, 2.4.5-p7, 2.4.4-p8 and earlier contain an improper authentication vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to gain unauthorized elevated privileges within the application through a high-complexity attack that does not require user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3.7= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 2.4.2= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6>= 1.2.0, <= 1.4.0= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Commerce or Magento installation versionRun command: composer show magento/product-community-edition 2>/dev/null | grep version or check the version.php file in app/magento directoryAffected if Version matches 2.3.7, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, or 2.4.7 (any patch level)
-
Check if Adobe Commerce Webhooks module is installedRun: composer show magento/module-webhooks 2>/dev/null or list enabled modules via bin/magento module:status | grep WebhooksAffected if Adobe Commerce Webhooks module version is between 1.2.0 and 1.4.0 inclusive
-
Verify webhooks API endpoint configurationInspect etc/webapi_rest/routes.xml or check for webhooks-related routes in the API configuration files under app/etc/Affected if Webhooks API endpoints are exposed and accessible without authentication
-
Confirm patch level for affected minor versionsRun bin/magento --version or check composer.lock for installed patch version detailsAffected if Running 2.4.6-p5 or earlier, 2.4.5-p7 or earlier, 2.4.4-p8 or earlier, or 2.4.7 without official security patch
You are affected if your Adobe Commerce or Magento installation version falls within the affected range AND the Adobe Commerce Webhooks module (version 1.2.0 to 1.4.0) is installed and enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to potentially escalate privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the official Adobe Commerce security patches or upgrade to a patched version to remediate the authentication bypass. Ensure backup and staging environments are available before applying updates.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.7-p1 or later / 2.4.8 (or latest 2.4.x release)
- 1. Backup your Adobe Commerce/Magento database and files before any upgrade operation
- 2. Review the official Adobe security bulletin at helpx.adobe.com for the specific patch or release notes
- 3. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4-2.4.7: Upgrade to the latest available version (2.4.7-p1 or later, or 2.4.8 if available) which contains the security fix
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.3.7-2.4.2: Upgrade to a supported version (2.4.4 or later) that includes the security fix
- 5. For Commerce Webhooks 1.2.0-1.4.0: Update to Webhooks version 1.4.1 or later if available, or upgrade the overall Commerce version
- 6. After upgrade, verify the patch is applied by checking the admin panel version or running bin/magento --version
- 7. Clear caches: bin/magento cache:flush
- 8. Test critical workflows to confirm normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data