CVE-2024-37081
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe vCenter Server contains multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities due to misconfiguration of sudo. An authenticated local user with non-administrative privileges may exploit these issues to elevate privileges to root on vCenter Server Appliance.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencevCenter Server Appliance contains sudo misconfigurations that allow authenticated local users with non-administrative privileges to execute privileged commands as root, enabling full system compromise through improper sudoers file entries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 7.0>= 4.0, < 5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the VMware product typeDetermine if the system is running VMware vCenter Server Appliance (VCSA) or VMware Cloud Foundation by checking the product name or known system identifiers.Affected if The system is either vCenter Server Appliance or VMware Cloud Foundation.
-
Check the installed Vcenter Server or Cloud Foundation versionRun 'vpxd -v' or check the VMware Appliance Management Interface (VAMI) for the exact version number, or use 'vimsh -n -e "invokegetconfig vpxd.product_version"'Affected if The version is 8.0, 7.0, or for Cloud Foundation any version >= 4.0 and < 5.2.
-
Review sudoers file permissionsExamine /etc/sudoers and files in /etc/sudoers.d/ for entries that grant root privileges to non-administrative users or service accounts.Affected if Non-privileged local users or service accounts have sudo permissions allowing execution of arbitrary commands as root.
-
Enumerate local users with sudo privilegesRun 'sudo -l -U <username>' for known local users, or use 'getent passwd' to list local users and check each one's sudo access.Affected if Any authenticated local user with non-administrative privileges can list sudo rules that permit root command execution.
-
Verify user privilege levelsCheck /etc/group for membership in groups like root, wheel, or administrator-equivalent groups for non-admin service accounts.Affected if Users assigned to privileged groups do not require administrative privileges in the vCenter context.
A user is affected if the system runs vCenter Server 7.0/8.0 or Cloud Foundation 4.x-5.1.x AND any local non-administrative user has sudo permissions to run commands as root.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2
Audit and remediate sudoers configuration to remove or restrict excessive sudo permissions for non-privileged users, following VMware security advisories and least-privilege principles.
vCenter Server 8.0 U2+ or 7.0 U2+ (contact Broadcom for exact patch bundles); Cloud Foundation 5.2+
- Check current vCenter Server Appliance version: `vpxd -v` or from the vSphere Client UI under System > Summary
- For vCenter Server 7.0: Upgrade to a version that includes the security patch for CVE-2024-37081 (contact Broadcom support for specific patch bundle)
- For vCenter Server 8.0: Upgrade to a version that includes the security patch for CVE-2024-37081 (contact Broadcom support for specific patch bundle)
- For Cloud Foundation: Upgrade to version 5.2 or later which addresses this vulnerability
- Ensure you have valid backups and snapshots before performing any upgrade
- Schedule maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- Follow standard vCenter Server upgrade procedure via the UI or command line
- Verify the fix by checking the vCenter Server version post-upgrade and confirming sudo configurations have been remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37081 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data