Powerscale OnefsApplication · Dell

CVE-2024-37126

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.7.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized gain of root-level access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Dell PowerScale OneFS contains an improper privilege management vulnerability that allows a local high-privileged attacker to escalate privileges and gain unauthorized root-level access. The vulnerability exists in versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 and requires local access with high privileges as a prerequisite for exploitation.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided patch or upgrade to a fixed OneFS version as specified in Dell's security advisory. Restrict local administrative access and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation activities until the patch is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Powerscale OnefsApplication
Affected:= 9.8.0.0>= 8.2.2, < 9.7.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Dell PowerScale OneFS is installed
    Identify whether the target system is running Dell PowerScale OneFS. This is typically a scale-out NAS storage system. Check system documentation or run generic system information commands to confirm the product name.
    Affected if The system is running Dell PowerScale OneFS and the product is confirmed.
  2. Determine the installed OneFS version
    Use the appropriate command or method to retrieve the OneFS firmware/software version. Common methods include checking system management interfaces, using CLI tools like 'isi version' or 'isi status', or reviewing system configuration files that store the OneFS version.
    Affected if A OneFS version can be retrieved and is displayed.
  3. Compare the installed version against affected ranges
    Evaluate the retrieved version against the vulnerable ranges: version 9.8.0.0 exactly, and any version from 8.2.2 up to but not including 9.7.1.0. Create a version comparison to determine if the installed version falls within these ranges.
    Affected if The installed version is 9.8.0.0 OR any version >= 8.2.2 and < 9.7.1.0, indicating the system is affected by the vulnerability.
  4. Verify local high-privileged access exists
    Assess whether local user accounts with elevated privileges (such as administrative or root-level access) are configured on the OneFS system. Review local user configurations, sudo policies, or administrative group memberships.
    Affected if Local high-privileged accounts exist on the system, which is a prerequisite condition for potential exploitation of this vulnerability.

A system is affected if it runs Dell PowerScale OneFS version 9.8.0.0 or any version from 8.2.2 through 9.7.0.x, and has local high-privileged accounts configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.7.1.0 or later
Fixed in 9.7.1.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided patch or upgrade to a fixed OneFS version as specified in Dell's security advisory. Restrict local administrative access and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation activities until the patch is applied.

Fix this in Powerscale Onefs Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37126 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37126 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data