CVE-2024-38810
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization When Using @AuthorizeReturnObject in Spring Security 6.3.0 and 6.3.1 allows attacker to render security annotations inaffective.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Spring Security 6.3.0 and 6.3.1, the @AuthorizeReturnObject annotation fails to properly enforce authorization on returned objects, allowing attackers to bypass security checks and access data they shouldn't have permission to view.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Spring Security versionInspect your build configuration file (pom.xml, build.gradle, or equivalent) or the Spring Security library JAR manifest to identify the exact version of spring-security-core (or spring-security-web) in use. Look for entries like spring-security-core:6.3.0 or spring-security-web:6.3.1.Affected if The installed version is 6.3.0 or 6.3.1 (versions >= 6.3.0 and < 6.3.2 are affected)
-
Search for @AuthorizeReturnObject usageSearch your Java/Kotlin source code for any usage of the annotation @AuthorizeReturnObject, including fully qualified references such as org.springframework.security.authorization.method.AuthorizeReturnObject. Search across all source files in your project.Affected if The annotation is present and being used on methods that return objects requiring authorization checks
-
Verify method return typeFor each method annotated with @AuthorizeReturnObject, identify the return type of that method and determine whether the returned objects contain sensitive data that should be protected by authorization checks.Affected if Methods with @AuthorizeReturnObject return sensitive data that should require authorization but the annotation is not enforcing it properly in versions 6.3.0-6.3.1
-
Test authorization enforcementIf possible, invoke methods annotated with @AuthorizeReturnObject using an account that should NOT have permission to access the returned data, and verify whether the authorization check is properly blocking unauthorized access.Affected if The method executes successfully and returns data without throwing an AccessDeniedException or authentication error when called by an unauthorized user
You are affected if your environment uses Spring Security version 6.3.0 or 6.3.1 AND employs @AuthorizeReturnObject on methods returning sensitive data that should be protected but may be accessible without proper authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3.2
Upgrade to Spring Security 6.3.2 or later where the vulnerability is patched, and audit all usages of @AuthorizeReturnObject to verify authorization is correctly enforced.
Spring Security 6.3.2
- Update the Spring Security dependency version in your project's pom.xml or build.gradle file to 6.3.2 or later
- For Maven: Change <spring-security.version> to 6.3.2 or update the spring-security-dependencies bom
- For Gradle: Change implementation 'org.springframework.security:spring-security-core:6.3.0' to implementation 'org.springframework.security:spring-security-core:6.3.2'
- Rebuild and test the application to ensure the authorization annotations work correctly
- Verify that @AuthorizeReturnObject properly enforces authorization on returned objects
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-38810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-38810 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data