CVE-2024-39398
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by an Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform brute force attacks and potentially gain unauthorized access to accounts. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, but attack complexity is high.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability where the platform fails to adequately limit or block repeated failed login attempts. This allows attackers to conduct brute force attacks against user accounts, potentially gaining unauthorized access without requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7<= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe Commerce or Magento versionRun the command 'php bin/magento --version' from the Magento root directory, or check the 'composer.json' file for the 'version' field in the root directory.Affected if The installed version is 2.4.3 or lower, or exactly 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, or 2.4.7.
-
Verify account lockout settings in admin panelLog into the admin panel and navigate to Stores > Configuration > Customer > Customer Configuration > Account Lockout Options. Verify if the 'Max Login Failures to Lockout Account' is set to a non-zero value and 'Lockout Time (seconds)' is configured.Affected if The 'Max Login Failures to Lockout Account' is set to 0 (disabled) or is not configured, indicating no account lockout protection.
-
Check CAPTCHA configuration for loginNavigate to Stores > Configuration > Customer > Customer Configuration > CAPTCHA. Verify if CAPTCHA is enabled for the 'Frontend' or 'Adminhtml' login forms.Affected if CAPTCHA is disabled for all login forms, leaving the system reliant only on password-based authentication.
-
Inspect authentication rate limiting configurationCheck the web server (Apache/Nginx) configuration files or any WAF/firewall rules for rate limiting on authentication endpoints such as /customer/account/login or /admin/auth/login.Affected if No rate limiting rules are configured on authentication endpoints, allowing unlimited rapid login attempts.
A user is affected if their Adobe Commerce/Magento version falls within the affected range AND no account lockout, CAPTCHA, or rate limiting is configured on authentication endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement or enable proper account lockout mechanisms with appropriate threshold and duration settings, integrate CAPTCHA for repeated failed attempts, and configure rate limiting on authentication endpoints to prevent automated brute force attacks.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.4-p9 / 2.4.5-p8 / 2.4.6-p6 / 2.4.7-p1 or later (or migrate to Adobe Commerce 2.4.7 which includes the fix)
- Identify your current Adobe Commerce or Magento version by running: php bin/magento --version
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4: Upgrade to patch version 2.4.4-p9 or later (e.g., 2.4.4-p10)
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5: Upgrade to patch version 2.4.5-p8 or later (e.g., 2.4.5-p9)
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6: Upgrade to patch version 2.4.6-p6 or later (e.g., 2.4.6-p7)
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.7: Upgrade to patch version 2.4.7-p1 or later
- Run composer require magento/product-community-edition=2.4.4-p9 --no-update (adjust version for your baseline)
- Run composer update to install the patch
- Run php bin/magento setup:upgrade to apply database changes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39398 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39398 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data