CVE-2024-45128
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and have a low impact on integrity and availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn Improper Authorization vulnerability in Adobe Commerce allows low-privileged authenticated users to bypass security measures, potentially compromising integrity and availability of the e-commerce platform.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 2.3.7= 2.4.0= 2.4.1= 2.4.2= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2all versions= 2.4.3= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Adobe Commerce or Magento installationCheck if the system runs Adobe Commerce or Magento by locating the composer.json file in the web root or checking the app/etc/env.php file for platform identification.Affected if The system is confirmed to be Adobe Commerce or Magento.
-
Determine the installed Adobe Commerce versionRun the command 'php bin/magento --version' from the web root directory, or inspect the composer.json file to read the 'version' field.Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 2.3.7, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or is any version for 'all versions'.
-
Determine if Adobe Commerce B2B is installedRun the command 'php bin/magento module:status Magento_B2b' or check composer.json for the presence of 'magento/module-b2b' package.Affected if Adobe Commerce B2B module is enabled and the installed B2B version matches 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, or 1.4.2.
-
Determine the installed Magento versionRun 'php bin/magento --version' or check the composer.json file in an Magento Open Source installation to identify the version.Affected if The system is Magento Open Source and the version matches 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or is any version for 'all versions'.
-
Review low-privileged user accountsCheck the admin user management panel or query the admin_user table in the database to list all users with roles other than full administrative privileges.Affected if There exist user accounts with limited or custom roles that could potentially exploit an authorization bypass.
A user is affected if they run Adobe Commerce or Magento with a version matching the affected list, or any version if labeled as 'all versions', particularly when low-privileged authenticated users exist in the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Adobe's security patches for versions 2.4.7-p2, 2.4.6-p7, 2.4.5-p9, 2.4.4-p10 and earlier to address the authorization bypass.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.7-p2 (or latest 2.4.x release with security patch)
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce/Magento version by checking the composer.json file or admin panel.
- 2. Determine if your version is in the affected list (2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7 or earlier).
- 3. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4.x users: Upgrade to 2.4.4-p10 or later.
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5.x users: Upgrade to 2.4.5-p9 or later.
- 5. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6.x users: Upgrade to 2.4.6-p7 or later.
- 6. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.7.x users: Upgrade to 2.4.7-p2 or later.
- 7. Run composer update to apply the new packages.
- 8. Clear the Magento cache and reindex after upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45128 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45128 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data