Access CommanderApplication · 2n

CVE-2024-47254

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In 2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior, an Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability could allow an attacker to escalate their privileges and gain root access to the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

2N Access Commander versions 3.1.1.2 and prior contain an Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges and gain root access to the system. This appears to be a logic flaw in how the application validates user input or system data, allowing privilege escalation beyond the attacker's assigned permissions.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of 2N Access Commander beyond 3.1.1.2 when available. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for unauthorized root-level access attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Access CommanderApplication
Affected:<= 3.1.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if 2N Access Commander is installed
    Locate the 2N Access Commander installation directory or service on the system. Check running processes for the Access Commander service.
    Affected if The product is present on the system.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the installed version of 2N Access Commander against the affected range. Compare your version to 3.1.1.2 - versions at or below this value are affected.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.1.1.2 or lower.
  3. Review user account configurations
    Examine all user accounts configured in Access Commander, noting their assigned permission levels. Check for any accounts with privileges beyond what they should normally have.
    Affected if Any account has privileges beyond what was intentionally assigned.
  4. Audit administrative actions and logs
    Review Access Commander logs and audit trails for administrative actions that indicate privilege escalation, particularly actions performed by standard users that resulted in elevated access.
    Affected if Standard users have performed root-level or administrative actions.
  5. Check for unauthorized root access
    Inspect system-level access records or audit logs for any root-level commands or access attempts originating from the Access Commander application.
    Affected if Root access occurred through the application by non-root accounts.
  6. Verify authentication mechanisms
    Confirm that the application properly validates user input and enforces permission boundaries during authentication and authorization flows.
    Affected if The application allows authenticated users to bypass permission checks.

A user is affected if 2N Access Commander version 3.1.1.2 or lower is installed and any authenticated user account can perform actions beyond its assigned permission level, including gaining root access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1.1.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of 2N Access Commander beyond 3.1.1.2 when available. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor for unauthorized root-level access attempts.

Fix this in Access Commander Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47254 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47254 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data