CVE-2025-59783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAPI endpoint for user synchronization in 2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for OS command injection. This vulnerability can only be exploited after authenticating with administrator privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidence2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the API endpoint for user synchronization due to insufficient input validation. An authenticated administrator can inject arbitrary OS commands through unsanitized input parameters passed to the user sync functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed 2N Access Commander versionLocate the version information for your 2N Access Commander installation through the web interface, system diagnostics, or installed packages listing. Common locations include the administration panel's system info section or package management tools.Affected if The installed version is 3.4.1 or any version prior to 3.4.2
-
Verify user synchronization feature is configuredCheck if the user synchronization functionality is enabled in the 2N Access Commander administration interface. Look for settings related to LDAP/AD synchronization, user import, or external identity provider integration.Affected if User synchronization is actively configured or has been used recently
-
Review API access logs for user sync endpointExamine authentication and API access logs for requests to user synchronization endpoints. Look for any entries involving command execution or unusual parameter patterns in sync-related API calls.Affected if There are recent API calls to user sync endpoints from administrator accounts with unexpected parameter content
-
Check for unauthorized administrator accountsReview the list of administrator accounts in the system for any unauthorized or unexpected entries that may have been created through the command injection vulnerability.Affected if New or unexpected administrator accounts exist that were not created through legitimate administrative actions
-
Inspect system for unexpected processes or scheduled tasksExamine running processes and scheduled tasks on the 2N Access Commander server for any unrecognized or suspicious commands that may have been injected and persisted.Affected if Unexpected processes, scripts, or scheduled tasks are present on the system
Your environment is affected if 2N Access Commander version is 3.4.1 or earlier AND the user synchronization feature is enabled, as this combination exposes the vulnerable API endpoint to authenticated administrators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.4.2
Implement strict input validation and parameterized queries or sandboxed command execution for the user synchronization API endpoint. Consider using allowlist validation for all user-supplied input and replacing any dynamic command construction with safe API calls.
Access Commander 3.4.2
- Locate your current 2N Access Commander installation and verify the installed version
- Access the 2N official support website or admin console to obtain version 3.4.2
- Follow the standard 2N Access Commander upgrade procedure documented in the official administration guide
- After upgrading, verify the new version is 3.4.2 or higher
- Confirm the API endpoint for user synchronization is now properly sanitizing input
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data