Access CommanderApplication · 2n

CVE-2025-59784

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.4.2 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
2N Access Commander version 3.4.1 and prior is vulnerable to log pollution. Certain parameters sent over API may be included in the logs without prior validation or sanitisation. This vulnerability can only be exploited after authenticating with administrator privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

2N Access Commander versions 3.4.1 and prior contain a log pollution vulnerability where certain API parameters are written to application logs without validation or sanitization. An authenticated administrator can inject arbitrary content into logs through unsanitized API parameters, potentially enabling log injection attacks, log forging, or manipulation of log analysis systems.

MitigationImplement input validation and sanitization for all API parameters before they are written to logs. Upgrade to a patched version of 2N Access Commander if available. Additionally, ensure log consumers perform output encoding when parsing or displaying logged data.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Access CommanderApplication
Affected:< 3.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed 2N Access Commander version
    Access the administration interface or check system information to determine the currently installed version of 2N Access Commander. This is typically visible in the About section or system settings.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.4.1 or any version prior to 3.4.2
  2. Verify administrator account exists
    Check if there is at least one active administrator account configured in the 2N Access Commander system. Log into the administration interface and navigate to user management.
    Affected if An authenticated administrator account exists and can access the API interface
  3. Confirm API logging is active
    Examine the application logs directory for 2N Access Commander. Look for log files that record API requests and their parameters. Default locations may include /var/log/ or the application's data directory.
    Affected if API requests are being logged to disk and the log files contain parameter data from API calls

You are affected if you are running version 3.4.1 or prior and your system logs API parameters from authenticated administrator sessions to accessible log files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.4.2 or later
Fixed in 3.4.2
Interim mitigation

Implement input validation and sanitization for all API parameters before they are written to logs. Upgrade to a patched version of 2N Access Commander if available. Additionally, ensure log consumers perform output encoding when parsing or displaying logged data.

Recommended fix High confidence

Access Commander 3.4.2

  1. Verify current Access Commander version in use
  2. Download Access Commander version 3.4.2 from the official 2N website or trusted distribution channel
  3. Review upgrade documentation specific to Access Commander
  4. Perform upgrade following standard 2N upgrade procedures
  5. Verify successful upgrade to version 3.4.2 or later
  6. Confirm administrator access is properly secured post-upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Access Commander Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59784 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data