AllegraApplication · Alltena

CVE-2024-5580

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.0 Published 2024-11-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.5.2 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Allegra loadFieldMatch Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the loadFieldMatch method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of LOCAL SERVICE. Was ZDI-CAN-23452.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a deserialization vulnerability in the loadFieldMatch method of Allegra. The method lacks proper validation of user-supplied data, allowing deserialization of untrusted data. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to achieve remote code execution in the context of the LOCAL SERVICE account.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on the loadFieldMatch method and avoid deserializing untrusted data. If deserialization is required, use safe deserialization formats or whitelist expected types.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AllegraApplication
Affected:< 7.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Allegra is installed
    Check for Allegra application files or service running on the system. Look for the allegra process or web application directory.
    Affected if Allegra software is found running on the system
  2. Determine installed Allegra version
    Check the application's version information, typically found in the About section, a version file, or the application metadata (e.g., MANIFEST.MF, version.properties, or the web interface footer).
    Affected if The installed version is any version below 7.5.2 (e.g., 7.5.1, 7.5.0, 7.4.x, etc.)
  3. Confirm loadFieldMatch method accessibility
    Inspect if the loadFieldMatch API endpoint or method is exposed and accessible within the application. This is typically found in the application's API documentation, routing configuration, or by checking available web service endpoints.
    Affected if The loadFieldMatch method is accessible without additional authentication or with standard user authentication
  4. Verify authentication controls on the method
    Review the application's security configuration or authentication settings to determine if the loadFieldMatch method enforces proper authentication and authorization before processing requests.
    Affected if The loadFieldMatch method can be invoked by authenticated users without additional hardening or input validation safeguards
  5. Check deserialization configuration
    Review application configuration files or settings related to object deserialization. Look for configurations that allow Java deserialization or similar mechanisms used by the loadFieldMatch method.
    Affected if Deserialization of untrusted data is permitted without type checking or input validation on the loadFieldMatch method

The environment is affected if Allegra (Alltena Allegra) is installed with a version lower than 7.5.2 and the loadFieldMatch method is accessible to authenticated users without proper input validation on deserialized data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.5.2 or later
Fixed in 7.5.2
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input validation on the loadFieldMatch method and avoid deserializing untrusted data. If deserialization is required, use safe deserialization formats or whitelist expected types.

Recommended fix High confidence

Allegra version 7.5.2

  1. Upgrade Allegra to version 7.5.2 or later to resolve the deserialization vulnerability in the loadFieldMatch method

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Allegra Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data