CVE-2024-5580
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllegra loadFieldMatch Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the loadFieldMatch method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of LOCAL SERVICE. Was ZDI-CAN-23452.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a deserialization vulnerability in the loadFieldMatch method of Allegra. The method lacks proper validation of user-supplied data, allowing deserialization of untrusted data. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to achieve remote code execution in the context of the LOCAL SERVICE account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Allegra is installedCheck for Allegra application files or service running on the system. Look for the allegra process or web application directory.Affected if Allegra software is found running on the system
-
Determine installed Allegra versionCheck the application's version information, typically found in the About section, a version file, or the application metadata (e.g., MANIFEST.MF, version.properties, or the web interface footer).Affected if The installed version is any version below 7.5.2 (e.g., 7.5.1, 7.5.0, 7.4.x, etc.)
-
Confirm loadFieldMatch method accessibilityInspect if the loadFieldMatch API endpoint or method is exposed and accessible within the application. This is typically found in the application's API documentation, routing configuration, or by checking available web service endpoints.Affected if The loadFieldMatch method is accessible without additional authentication or with standard user authentication
-
Verify authentication controls on the methodReview the application's security configuration or authentication settings to determine if the loadFieldMatch method enforces proper authentication and authorization before processing requests.Affected if The loadFieldMatch method can be invoked by authenticated users without additional hardening or input validation safeguards
-
Check deserialization configurationReview application configuration files or settings related to object deserialization. Look for configurations that allow Java deserialization or similar mechanisms used by the loadFieldMatch method.Affected if Deserialization of untrusted data is permitted without type checking or input validation on the loadFieldMatch method
The environment is affected if Allegra (Alltena Allegra) is installed with a version lower than 7.5.2 and the loadFieldMatch method is accessible to authenticated users without proper input validation on deserialized data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.2
Implement strict input validation on the loadFieldMatch method and avoid deserializing untrusted data. If deserialization is required, use safe deserialization formats or whitelist expected types.
Allegra version 7.5.2
- Upgrade Allegra to version 7.5.2 or later to resolve the deserialization vulnerability in the loadFieldMatch method
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5580 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data