CVE-2025-0586
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe a+HRD from aEnrich Technology has an Insecure Deserialization vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with database modification privileges and regular system privileges to perform arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencea+HRD from aEnrich Technology contains an insecure deserialization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with database modification privileges and regular system privileges to achieve arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability likely stems from unsafe deserialization of data retrieved from or stored in the database without proper validation or use of safe serialization formats.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if aEnrich A+HRD is installedLocate the a+HRD application in your environment - check installed programs on Windows or package lists on Linux for 'aEnrich' or 'A+HRD' softwareAffected if aEnrich A+HRD software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the application version through its about page, installation directory, or system registry - compare against the affected range (7.5 and below)Affected if The installed version is 7.5 or any version lower than 7.5
-
Verify database connectivity is enabledCheck if the application is configured with database connections (SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL) - look for connection strings or database configuration files in the application directoryAffected if Database connectivity is configured and active
-
Identify accounts with database modification privilegesReview user accounts and roles that have write/modify permissions on the application database - check database user mappings and application role assignmentsAffected if There are user accounts with both database modification rights and regular system access privileges
-
Check for deserialization activity in application logsSearch application and database logs for deserialization operations, serialized object handling, or unusual data processing patterns involving the databaseAffected if The application deserializes data retrieved from or stored in the database without apparent validation
You are affected if aEnrich A+HRD version 7.5 or lower is installed, database connectivity is enabled, and user accounts exist with both database modification privileges and regular system access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches immediately. Review and restrict database access privileges to minimize the attack surface, and implement whitelist-based validation on any deserialized data objects.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0586 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0586 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data