CVE-2025-11509
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/product_add.php. Performing manipulation of the argument prod_name results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0 in the /pages/product_add.php file. The prod_name parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL commands. This can lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed applicationLocate the E-Commerce Website installation directory and check for version indicators such as a version file, about page, or footer copyright notice mentioning 'Fabian E Commerce Website' or 'code-projects'.Affected if The application is Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0
-
Confirm the exact version numberInspect the source code for a version constant, check any README or version.txt file in the installation root, or query the application admin panel for version information.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of /pages/product_add.php in the web root directory. This file contains the prod_name parameter handling code.Affected if The file /pages/product_add.php exists in the installation
-
Determine application accessibilityVerify the web application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS. Attempt a test request to the product_add.php endpoint to confirm the prod_name parameter is processed.Affected if The application is accessible and the product_add.php endpoint responds to requests with the prod_name parameter
You are affected if you have Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0 installed with the /pages/product_add.php file accessible on your server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implement proper input validation on the prod_name parameter. Also apply the principle of least privilege to the database user account.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11509 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11509 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data