CVE-2025-11596
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /pages/delete_order_details.php. Executing manipulation of the argument order_id can lead to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0 in the /pages/delete_order_details.php file. The order_id parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. This can lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product versionLocate and inspect the E-Commerce Website installation directory. Look for version indicators such as version files, README files, or check the website's admin panel for version information.Affected if The installed version is Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0
-
Check for vulnerable file existenceInspect the web root directory for the presence of /pages/delete_order_details.phpAffected if The file /pages/delete_order_details.php exists in the web application directory
-
Examine the delete_order_details.php codeOpen and review the delete_order_details.php file, specifically looking at how the order_id parameter is handled in the codeAffected if The order_id parameter is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or apparent sanitization functions
-
Verify the order_id parameter is accessibleTest if the delete_order_details.php endpoint accepts user input via GET or POST parameters named 'order_id'Affected if The order_id parameter can be submitted to the application without validation
-
Confirm SQL query construction methodSearch the delete_order_details.php file for SQL query patterns - look for variables containing 'order_id' being concatenated or interpolated directly into SQL stringsAffected if SQL queries are constructed by concatenating the order_id parameter directly into the query string rather than using parameterized queries
You are affected if you have Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0 installed AND the /pages/delete_order_details.php file exists with the order_id parameter being used in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implement proper input validation on the order_id parameter. Apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- This vulnerability is in a code-projects.org student project (E-Commerce Website 1.0) which does not receive security updates.
- Manually remediate the SQL injection in /pages/delete_order_details.php by replacing the vulnerable order_id parameter usage with a prepared statement.
- Replace direct SQL concatenation with PDO prepared statements: Use $stmt = $pdo->prepare('DELETE FROM table WHERE order_id = :order_id') followed by $stmt->execute([':order_id' => $order_id]).
- Apply input validation: Ensure order_id is a valid integer using intval() or is_numeric() before using in queries.
- Remove or restrict the affected PHP file from public access if not actively used.
- Consider migrating to a maintained e-commerce platform with active security support.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11596 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11596 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data