dbcve.org
E Commerce WebsiteApplication · Fabian

CVE-2025-11511

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw has been found in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /pages/supplier_add.php. Executing manipulation of the argument supp_email can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the /pages/supplier_add.php file of code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. The supp_email parameter accepts unsanitized user input that is directly concatenated into SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. With a CVSS score of 9.8, this critical vulnerability could allow complete database compromise, including data exfiltration or administrative access.

MitigationImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all SQL operations involving user input, specifically the supp_email parameter. Additionally, apply input validation and enforce least-privilege database accounts to limit the impact of any successful injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
E Commerce WebsiteApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Fabian E Commerce Website v1.0 is installed
    Check your web server document root for the presence of an e-commerce application directory. Look for typical installation paths like /var/www/html/, /www/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\. Search for files containing 'Fabian' or 'E Commerce' in their metadata or check application README files.
    Affected if The Fabian E Commerce Website version 1.0 is present on the server
  2. Locate the supplier_add.php file
    Search for the file /pages/supplier_add.php within the web application directory structure. This file is typically found under the main application root in a 'pages' subdirectory.
    Affected if The file /pages/supplier_add.php exists in the application
  3. Verify supplier management module is accessible
    Check if the supplier management functionality is enabled by attempting to access the supplier add page via HTTP request to the application's supplier_add endpoint, or by reviewing the application's navigation/menu configuration files to confirm the supplier module is active.
    Affected if The supplier management module is enabled and accessible to users
  4. Inspect supp_email parameter handling for SQL injection
    Open /pages/supplier_add.php and examine the code around the supp_email parameter. Search for SQL query construction that directly concatenates the supp_email value without using prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization functions.
    Affected if The supp_email parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization, with direct concatenation of user input into the query string

You are affected if Fabian E Commerce Website v1.0 is installed, the /pages/supplier_add.php file exists, the supplier module is accessible, and the supp_email parameter is handled via direct string concatenation in SQL queries rather than parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all SQL operations involving user input, specifically the supp_email parameter. Additionally, apply input validation and enforce least-privilege database accounts to limit the impact of any successful injection.

Fix this in E Commerce Website Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-11511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-11511 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data