CVE-2025-12454
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in OpenText™ Vertica allows Reflected XSS. The vulnerability could lead to Reflected XSS attack of cross-site scripting in Vertica management console application.This issue affects Vertica: from 10.0 through 10.X, from 11.0 through 11.X, from 12.0 through 12.X, from 23.0 through 23.X, from 24.0 through 24.X, from 25.1.0 through 25.1.X.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected XSS vulnerability in OpenText Vertica management console where user-supplied input is not properly neutralized during web page generation, allowing injection of malicious scripts that execute in the context of the user's browser session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0-0, < 25.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Vertica installation existsIdentify if Vertica is installed on the system. Check for /opt/vertica directory, running vertica processes, or installed packages. Common installation paths include /opt/vertica/. Query the database with 'vsql -c "SELECT VERSION();"' if credentials are available.Affected if Vertica database software is installed on the system
-
Determine installed Vertica versionRun 'vertica -V' from the Vertica bin directory, or check the VERSION file in /opt/vertica/, or query: SELECT VERSION();Affected if Installed version is 10.0.0-0 or higher but below 25.2.0
-
Confirm Management Console is accessibleCheck if the Management Console service is running and accessible. The MC typically listens on ports 5444 (HTTPS) or 5434 (HTTP). Use 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "5444|5434"' or 'ss -tlnp | grep -E "5444|5434"' to check if these ports are listening.Affected if Management Console port is open and accepting connections
-
Check Management Console exposureEvaluate whether the Management Console web interface is accessible to untrusted users or networks. Verify network binding configuration and any access control lists. The vulnerability is exploitable when a user clicks a crafted malicious link to the MC interface.Affected if Management Console is accessible to untrusted users or untrusted networks and version is in affected range
User is affected if Vertica version is 10.0.0-0 or higher but below 25.2.0 AND the Management Console is accessible (even internally), since the reflected XSS executes in the context of a legitimate user's browser session.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.2.0
Apply vendor-provided patches for affected Vertica versions. Implement input validation and output encoding on all user-facing endpoints in the management console as a defense-in-depth measure.
25.2.0 or later
- Download Vertica version 25.2.0 or later from the OpenText/Vertica portal
- Perform a full backup of your Vertica database before upgrading
- Stop all Vertica services on the node(s) being upgraded
- Upgrade Vertica to version 25.2.0 or later using the standard upgrade procedure for your deployment type (in-place or rolling upgrade)
- Start Vertica services and verify the upgrade completed successfully
- Access the Vertica Management Console and verify the XSS vulnerability in reflected parameters has been remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12454 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12454 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data