CVE-2025-1316
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEdimax IC-7100 does not properly neutralize requests. An attacker can create specially crafted requests to achieve remote code execution on the device
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Edimax IC-7100 IP camera contains a command injection vulnerability where the device fails to properly sanitize user input in HTTP requests, allowing an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the underlying Linux-based firmware with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device on your networkScan your network for devices with HTTP services on common ports (80, 8080, 443) and check the HTTP response header or login page for 'Edimax' and 'IC-7100' brandingAffected if The device is an Edimax IC-7100 network camera on your network
-
Confirm firmware versionAccess the device web interface (usually via its IP address) and navigate to the System or Status page to view the firmware version informationAffected if Any firmware version is displayed (all versions are affected)
-
Check if remote web access is enabledIn the device web interface, go to Network or Security settings and verify whether the web-based management interface is accessible from external/network interfacesAffected if Remote web access or management interface is enabled and accessible
-
Look for signs of compromiseReview device logs for unexpected commands, new user accounts, or unusual network connections. Check if the device is making outbound connections to unknown IP addressesAffected if Logs show unexpected administrative actions, new accounts, or suspicious network traffic
If you have an Edimax IC-7100 camera with its web interface accessible on your network, you are affected by this vulnerability since all firmware versions contain the injection flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor firmware update if available; if no patch exists, isolate the device on a restricted network segment and consider replacement. Network-side controls like blocking management interfaces from untrusted networks can reduce exploitability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-1316 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-1316 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data