CVE-2025-13234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /index.php?q=product. Performing manipulation of the argument PROID results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the PROID parameter in the /index.php?q=product endpoint. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries, enabling attackers to manipulate query logic, exfiltrate data, or potentially execute operating system commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application versionIdentify if the Janobe/itsourcecode Inventory Management System version 1.0 is installed. Check application banners, about pages, or source code for version identifiers matching 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Janobe Inventory Management System 1.0 or itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint existsConfirm the application exposes the /index.php?q=product endpoint by accessing it via HTTP request and observing the response.Affected if The endpoint returns a product listing page or accepts the q=product parameter
-
Check if PROID parameter is acceptedSubmit an HTTP request to /index.php?q=product with a PROID parameter (e.g., PROID=1) and observe if the application processes it as a product identifier.Affected if The application accepts and processes the PROID parameter without rejecting it
-
Identify if dynamic SQL is usedExamine the application source code, specifically the PHP file handling the product endpoint, for dynamic SQL query construction using the PROID value without parameterized queries or input sanitization.Affected if The code uses direct string concatenation or interpolation of the PROID parameter into SQL queries (e.g., SELECT * FROM products WHERE id='$PROID')
A user is affected if they are running Janobe/itsourcecode Inventory Management System version 1.0 with the /index.php?q=product endpoint exposed and the PROID parameter processed through unsanitized dynamic SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) in the product listing functionality. Sanitize and validate all user inputs before using them in database operations. Implement least-privilege database accounts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data