CVE-2025-13237
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /LogSignModal.PHP. The manipulation of the argument U_USERNAME results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0 at /LogSignModal.PHP where the U_USERNAME parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Janobe Inventory Management System 1.0 is installedInspect your web server document root for the presence of itsourcecode or Janobe Inventory Management System files, typically found in the web root directory. Look for files like index.php or other application files that indicate this specific system.Affected if The system is Janobe Inventory Management System version 1.0 from itsourcecode.
-
Locate the vulnerable LogSignModal.PHP fileSearch for the file LogSignModal.PHP within the application directory structure, typically in the web root or a subdirectory of the installed application.Affected if The file /LogSignModal.PHP exists in the application.
-
Inspect the U_USERNAME parameter handling in LogSignModal.PHPOpen LogSignModal.PHP and examine how the U_USERNAME parameter is processed. Look for SQL query construction that uses this parameter directly without using prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization functions.Affected if The code directly incorporates the U_USERNAME parameter into SQL queries without sanitization or prepared statements.
-
Determine if the application is network-accessibleCheck network configuration to determine whether the server hosting the application is accessible from untrusted networks. Verify if the web server listens on public IP addresses or is exposed through firewall rules.Affected if The application is reachable from remote/untrusted networks.
A user is affected if they have Janobe Inventory Management System 1.0 installed with the file LogSignModal.PHP present and the U_USERNAME parameter handled without prepared statements, especially if the system is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately sanitize or parameterize the U_USERNAME input using prepared statements, or restrict network access to the affected endpoint until a patched version is available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13237 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13237 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data