CVE-2025-13257
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /admin/user/index.php?view=edit. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Inventory Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the ID parameter at /admin/user/index.php?view=edit. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication in the admin panel's user edit functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Inventory Management System installationLocate the web application directory and identify if the 'itsourcecode' or 'Janobe' Inventory Management System is installed. Look for the /admin/user/index.php file which contains the vulnerable user edit functionality.Affected if The application directory contains itsourcecode/Janobe Inventory Management System with the /admin/user/index.php file present
-
Verify application versionAccess the main page of the application or check any version information file typically found in the web root (such as readme.txt, version.php, or the login page footer) to confirm the installed version is 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 of Janobe/itsourcecode Inventory Management System
-
Confirm vulnerable endpoint existsCheck if the file /admin/user/index.php exists and is accessible via the web server. This is the vulnerable component that handles the 'view=edit' parameter.Affected if The /admin/user/index.php file exists and is served by the web server
-
Check network accessibilityDetermine if the /admin/ panel is accessible from the network. Since this vulnerability is exploitable without authentication, verify whether the admin interface is exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if The admin panel or the vulnerable endpoint is accessible from untrusted network segments without requiring valid credentials
You are affected if Janobe/itsourcecode Inventory Management System version 1.0 is installed with the /admin/user/index.php file present and accessible, exposing the ID parameter in the edit functionality to potential SQL injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements and implement proper input validation on all user-supplied parameters. Apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-13257 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-13257 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data