CVE-2025-20206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the interprocess communication (IPC) channel of Cisco Secure Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL hijacking attack on an affected device if the Secure Firewall Posture Engine, formerly HostScan, is installed on Cisco Secure Client. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of resources that are loaded by the application at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPC message to a specific Cisco Secure Client process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected machine with SYSTEM privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the Windows system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco Secure Client for Windows contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability in its interprocess communication channel when the Secure Firewall Posture Engine (HostScan) is installed. An authenticated local attacker can send crafted IPC messages to a specific Cisco Secure Client process, causing the application to load a malicious DLL and execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.1.8.105CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco Secure Client installationCheck for Cisco Secure Client in Windows installed programs (Programs and Features) or look for its installation directory under Program Files or Program Files (x86).Affected if Cisco Secure Client is installed on the system.
-
Check installed version against affected rangeLocate the installed version of Cisco Secure Client - typically found in the program entry in Programs and Features, or check version info on the main executable file in the Cisco Secure Client installation directory.Affected if The installed version is lower than 5.1.8.105.
-
Confirm Secure Firewall Posture Engine (HostScan) is presentCheck if the HostScan module is installed as part of Cisco Secure Client - this is typically listed as a separate component or feature within the Cisco Secure Client suite.Affected if HostScan (Secure Firewall Posture Engine) is installed as a component of Cisco Secure Client.
-
Identify vulnerable IPC processLook for running Cisco Secure Client processes that handle interprocess communication, particularly processes related to HostScan or posture assessment functionality.Affected if A Cisco Secure Client process handling IPC is running with elevated privileges.
-
Check for DLL loading indicatorsMonitor or inspect the DLLs being loaded by Cisco Secure Client processes, particularly in directories writable by non-privileged users.Affected if Cisco Secure Client processes are loading DLLs from locations accessible to low-privilege users.
A system is affected if Cisco Secure Client version is below 5.1.8.105 AND the Secure Firewall Posture Engine (HostScan) component is installed, allowing an authenticated local attacker to exploit the IPC channel for DLL hijacking.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.8.105
Apply the vendor patch when available. Until then, restrict local user privileges where possible and monitor for suspicious DLL loading activity by Cisco Secure Client processes.
5.1.8.105 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco Secure Client installed on the Windows system by checking the installed programs or using the software's version information
- 2. If the installed version is lower than 5.1.8.105, obtain and install Cisco Secure Client version 5.1.8.105 or later from official Cisco sources
- 3. After installation, verify that the Secure Firewall Posture Engine (formerly HostScan) component is properly functioning
- 4. Confirm the installed version is now 5.1.8.105 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-20206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-20206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data