CVE-2025-24411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access affecting Confidentiality and Integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Improper Access Control vulnerability in Adobe Commerce (Magento) affecting versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier. A low-privileged attacker can bypass security measures to gain unauthorized access, impacting confidentiality and integrity. No user interaction is required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.4= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8< 1.3.3= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.0< 2.4.4= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Commerce versionRun the command 'php bin/magento --version' or check the composer.json file in the Magento root directory for the version entryAffected if The installed version is 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3 or lower, 2.4.6-p8 or lower, 2.4.5-p10 or lower, 2.4.4-p11 or lower, or any version below 2.4.4
-
Check Adobe Commerce B2B extension versionRun 'composer show magento/module-b2b' or check the composer.lock file for the magento/module-b2b package versionAffected if The B2B extension version is 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, 1.5.0, or any version below 1.3.3
-
Check Adobe Magento versionRun 'php bin/magento --version' if using Magento Open Source, or check the version in the admin panel under System > Settings > Configuration > Advanced > DeveloperAffected if The installed Magento version matches the same vulnerable version ranges as Adobe Commerce (2.4.4 through 2.4.8 inclusive and earlier)
-
Verify if the application is exposed to the networkConfirm whether the Magento instance is accessible from the network or internet, as exploitation requires no user interactionAffected if The vulnerable Adobe Commerce or Magento instance is network-accessible without proper firewall or access control restrictions
The environment is affected if Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, or Magento Open Source is installed and the version falls within 2.4.4 through 2.4.8 (inclusive) or earlier than 2.4.4, or if B2b extension version is 1.3.3 through 1.5.0 inclusive or below 1.3.3.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.32.4.4
Apply the vendor-provided security patch or upgrade to a patched Adobe Commerce version (2.4.4-p11 or higher for the 2.4.4 branch, 2.4.5-p10 or higher for the 2.4.5 branch, etc.). Test thoroughly in a staging environment before production deployment.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.7-p4+ (recommended stable) or 2.4.6-p9+; Commerce B2B 1.3.3-p4+, 1.3.4-p4+, or 1.3.5-p3+
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce/Magento version by checking the composer.json or admin panel.
- 2. For Commerce 2.4.4: Upgrade to 2.4.4-p12 or later (or migrate to 2.4.7-p4 or later, or 2.4.6-p9 or later).
- 3. For Commerce 2.4.5: Upgrade to 2.4.5-p11 or later (or migrate to 2.4.7-p4 or later, or 2.4.6-p9 or later).
- 4. For Commerce 2.4.6: Upgrade to 2.4.6-p9 or later (or migrate to 2.4.7-p4 or later).
- 5. For Commerce 2.4.7: Upgrade to 2.4.7-p4 or later.
- 6. For Commerce B2B 1.3.3: Upgrade to 1.3.3-p4 or later.
- 7. For Commerce B2B 1.3.4: Upgrade to 1.3.4-p4 or later.
- 8. For Commerce B2B 1.3.5: Upgrade to 1.3.5-p3 or later.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,952.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data