CVE-2025-24427
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability allowing low-privileged attackers to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. The vulnerability affects versions 2.4.8-beta1 through 2.4.4-p11 and earlier, and exploitation requires no user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.4= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8< 1.3.3= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.0< 2.4.4= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Commerce versionLocate the composer.json file in the Magento root directory and examine the 'version' field under 'require' > 'magento/product-community-edition', or access the admin panel and navigate to System > Settings > About Magento to view the installed version.Affected if The installed version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8, or is earlier than 2.4.4.
-
Check Adobe Commerce B2B module versionLocate the composer.json file in the Magento root directory and examine the 'version' field under 'require' > 'magento/module-b2b', or run the command 'php bin/magento module:status Magento_B2b' from the command line to confirm the module version.Affected if The B2B module version matches 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, or 1.5.0, or is earlier than 1.3.3.
-
Verify if B2B module is enabledRun the command 'php bin/magento module:status Magento_B2b' from the command line in the Magento root directory, or check the app/etc/config.php file for the entry 'Magento_B2b' set to '1'.Affected if The B2B module is installed and enabled (value is 1 in config.php or module status shows as enabled).
-
Check Magento Open Source version if Commerce not in useLocate the composer.json file in the Magento root directory and examine the 'version' field under 'require' > 'magento/module-b2b', or check the admin panel version display if available.Affected if The installed Magento Open Source version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8, or is earlier than 2.4.4, and the B2B module is enabled.
A user is affected if they are running Adobe Commerce or Magento Open Source version 2.4.4 through 2.4.8 (or earlier than 2.4.4) with the B2B module enabled, or Adobe Commerce B2B version 1.3.3 through 1.5.0 (or earlier than 1.3.3).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.32.4.4
Apply the vendor-supplied security patch or upgrade to a patched Adobe Commerce version. Verify access controls are functioning correctly after implementation.
Adobe Commerce 2.4.7 or later (2.4.7-p4 recommended) / Adobe Commerce B2B 1.3.6 or later
- Review the Adobe Commerce Security Bulletin (APSB25-14) for this vulnerability
- Identify your current Adobe Commerce/Magento version using bin/magento --version or the admin panel
- For Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.4 through 2.4.6, apply the latest security patch: 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.7-p4, or upgrade to 2.4.7 or later
- For Adobe Commerce B2B versions 1.3.3 through 1.3.5, apply the corresponding patch or upgrade to a patched version
- Verify the patch was applied successfully by checking bin/magento --version after patching
- Test the security fix by confirming low-privileged user accounts cannot gain unauthorized write access
- Ensure the upgrade does not break existing customizations or extensions in your environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24427 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data