CVE-2025-24434
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability allowing privilege escalation that enables attackers to bypass security measures and achieve session takeover without user interaction. The flaw affects multiple versions from 2.4.4-p11 through 2.4.8-beta1, with a CVSS 9.1 critical rating indicating severe impact on confidentiality and integrity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.0= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe Commerce versionRun command: bin/magento --version or check composer.json for version entryAffected if Version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8 (including patch versions like -p11 through -p8, beta1)
-
Verify Adobe Commerce B2B extension versionRun command: bin/magento module:status Magento_B2b or check composer.json for magento/module-b2b versionAffected if B2B extension version is 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, or 1.5.0
-
Confirm Magento Open Source versionCheck app/etc/env.php for edition type, or run: bin/magento admin:user:list to identify if community edition is in useAffected if Magento version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8 and is the affected release line
-
Check admin user account configurationQuery admin_user table or run: bin/magento admin:user:list to enumerate existing admin accountsAffected if Multiple admin accounts exist with varying privilege levels, indicating privilege escalation is possible
Your environment is affected if Adobe Commerce, Magento Open Source, or B2B extension version falls within 2.4.4 through 2.4.8 or the specified B2B versions, since the incorrect authorization vulnerability allows privilege escalation without user interaction.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided security patches for Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.4-p11, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.7-p3, and 2.4.8-beta1. Prioritize patching given the critical severity and no-user-interaction exploitation vector.
Upgrade to the latest stable release (recommended 2.4.8 or the latest 2.4.7-patch for your current line)
- Check your current Adobe Commerce or Magento version by running: bin/magento --version or checking composer.json
- Backup your database and codebase before upgrading
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4: Upgrade to 2.4.4-p11 or later
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5: Upgrade to 2.4.5-p10 or later
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6: Upgrade to 2.4.6-p8 or later
- For Adobe Commerce 2.4.7: Upgrade to 2.4.7-p3 or later
- If on Adobe Commerce 2.4.8-beta1, upgrade to the stable 2.4.8 release
- For Adobe Commerce B2B: Ensure the corresponding base Commerce version is patched as above, then update B2B extension to compatible version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24434 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24434 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data