CVE-2025-24438
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8-beta1, 2.4.7-p3, 2.4.6-p8, 2.4.5-p10, 2.4.4-p11 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality and integrity impact as high.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Adobe Commerce allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. When victims view the affected page, the stored script executes in their browser, enabling session hijacking and potential data theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.0= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe Commerce or Magento versionRun the command: php bin/magento --version or check the composer.json file in the web root for the version numberAffected if The version matches 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8 for Adobe Commerce/Magento, or 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, or 1.5.0 for Adobe Commerce B2b
-
Confirm customer account registration is enabledLog into the admin panel, navigate to Stores > Configuration > Customers > Customer Configuration > Account Options, and verify that Allow Customer Registration is set to YesAffected if Customer registration is enabled and the version is in the affected list
-
Review form fields accessible to low-privileged usersInspect forms accessible to unauthenticated or customer-level users, such as registration forms, review forms, contact forms, or address book forms. Check the HTML source for input fields and their name attributesAffected if Forms accepting user input are present and accessible without admin privileges
-
Check for stored XSS payloads in databaseQuery the database for potential XSS payloads in customer-submitted fields. Example: SELECT * FROM customer_entity WHERE email LIKE '%<script%' OR firstname LIKE '%<script%' OR lastname LIKE '%<script%'Affected if Records containing script tags or HTML in user-editable fields are found in the database
You are affected if your installed Adobe Commerce or Magento version matches one of the listed affected versions AND low-privileged users can submit data to form fields that are not properly sanitized or encoded on output.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-released security patches for affected versions and implement output encoding/ input validation on all user-controllable form fields.
Upgrade to Adobe Commerce 2.4.8 or later, or apply security patches: 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.6-p9, or 2.4.7-p4 (whichever applies to your current version)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Commerce/Magento version by running: bin/magento --version or checking the composer.json file
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version (see upgrade_path)
- 3. Create a complete backup of the codebase, database, and media files before proceeding
- 4. Test the upgrade in a staging environment that mirrors production
- 5. For patch-based fixes, apply the latest security patch corresponding to your version (e.g., patch for 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.6-p9, or 2.4.7-p4)
- 6. Run bin/magento setup:upgrade after applying patches
- 7. Clear caches: bin/magento cache:flush
- 8. Reindex if necessary: bin/magento indexer:reindex
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24438 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data