CVE-2025-27190
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Commerce contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability allowing attackers to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access to the application without any user interaction. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of the e-commerce platform and could allow security feature bypass.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.1= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Adobe Commerce versionRun the CLI command to check the Magento application version, typically via bin/magento --version or by inspecting the composer.json file in the installation rootAffected if The installed version is 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8 (all versions listed as affected)
-
Identify installed Adobe Magento versionIf using Magento Open Source, check the version via bin/magento --version or composer.jsonAffected if The installed version is 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, or 2.4.8 (all versions listed as affected)
-
Check if B2B module is enabledVerify whether the Adobe Commerce B2B module is installed and enabled on the system, typically via bin/magento module:status or by checking module configuration filesAffected if The B2B module is enabled and its version is 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, or 1.5.1
-
Review access control configurationsInspect the ACL (Access Control List) settings and role permissions in the admin panel under System > Permissions > User Roles or via configuration filesAffected if Any misconfigured or overly permissive ACL roles exist that could allow unauthorized access to protected resources
You are affected if your environment runs Adobe Commerce or Magento Open Source versions 2.4.4 through 2.4.8, or uses Adobe Commerce B2B versions 1.3.3 through 1.5.1, as all these versions contain the improper access control vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for the affected Adobe Commerce versions (2.4.4-p12, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.7-p4 and later). Verify access control configurations after patching to ensure the bypass vector is closed.
Upgrade to the latest available patch release for your version line (2.4.4-p13+, 2.4.5-p12+, 2.4.6-p10+, 2.4.7-p5+) or to 2.4.8 stable when available
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce or Magento 2 installation version using bin/magento --version or the admin panel.
- 2. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4: Upgrade to version 2.4.4-p13 or later using composer require magento/product-community-edition=2.4.4-p13 --no-update followed by composer update.
- 3. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5: Upgrade to version 2.4.5-p12 or later using composer require magento/product-community-edition=2.4.5-p12 --no-update followed by composer update.
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6: Upgrade to version 2.4.6-p10 or later using composer require magento/product-community-edition=2.4.6-p10 --no-update followed by composer update.
- 5. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.7: Upgrade to version 2.4.7-p5 or later using composer require magento/product-community-edition=2.4.7-p5 --no-update followed by composer update.
- 6. After upgrade, clear the cache using bin/magento cache:flush and verify the new version with bin/magento --version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27190 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27190 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data