CVE-2025-27206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce (formerly Magento) contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability allowing attackers to bypass security measures and gain limited write access without user interaction. The vulnerability affects versions 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 and earlier. This is a security feature bypass that could allow unauthorized modification of certain data or settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.2= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Commerce versionRun the command 'php bin/magento --version' or check the file 'app/etc/env.php' for the version string under 'version' or 'system' > 'default' > 'commerce' settingsAffected if The installed version matches 2.4.8, 2.4.7-p5, 2.4.6-p10, 2.4.5-p12, 2.4.4-p13 or earlier releases
-
Verify Adobe Commerce B2B module statusRun 'php bin/magento module:status Magento_B2b' or check composer.json for 'magento/module-b2b-core' versionAffected if The B2B module is installed and enabled on versions 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, 1.5.2 or earlier
-
Review admin user accounts for unauthorized accessQuery the admin_user table or navigate to System > Permissions > All Users in the admin panel to list all admin accountsAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized admin user accounts exist that were not created by your authorized administrators
-
Audit API integrations and integration tokensCheck System > Extensions > Integrations or query the oauth_token table for any newly created or unfamiliar integration tokensAffected if Unrecognized integrations or tokens exist that were not configured by your security team
-
Inspect access control role configurationsReview System > Permissions > User Roles and compare against documented role definitions, or query the authorization_role tableAffected if Roles have been modified to grant broader permissions than originally configured
You are affected if your Adobe Commerce installation runs a version within 2.4.4 through 2.4.8 (including patch versions) or your B2B module is at versions 1.3.3 through 1.5.2, and you observe unauthorized modifications to admin users, integrations, or role permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided security patch or upgrade to a patched version of Adobe Commerce. Review access control configurations and audit for any unauthorized changes following patch deployment.
Upgrade to the latest patch version within your release line (2.4.4-p14+, 2.4.5-p13+, 2.4.6-p11+, 2.4.7-p6+, 2.4.8-p1+)
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce version by running: bin/magento --version
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version
- 3. Backup your database and filesystem before upgrading
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4: Upgrade to version 2.4.4-p14 or later
- 5. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5: Upgrade to version 2.4.5-p13 or later
- 6. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6: Upgrade to version 2.4.6-p11 or later
- 7. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.7: Upgrade to version 2.4.7-p6 or later
- 8. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.8: Upgrade to version 2.4.8-p1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-27206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-27206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data