CVE-2025-34212
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 22.0.843 and Application prior to version 20.0.1923 (VA/SaaS deployments) possess CI/CD weaknesses: the build pulls an unverified third-party image, downloads the VirtualBox Extension Pack over plain HTTP without signature validation, and grants the jenkins account NOPASSWD for mount/umount. Together these allow supply chain or man-in-the-middle compromise of the build pipeline, injection of malicious firmware, and remote code execution as root on the CI host. This vulnerability has been identified by the vendor as: V-2023-007 — Supply Chain Attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVasion Print Virtual Appliance contains critical CI/CD supply chain vulnerabilities: builds pull unverified third-party images, download VirtualBox Extension Pack over plain HTTP without signature validation, and the jenkins account has NOPASSWD sudo access for mount/umount. These weaknesses enable MITM attacks to inject malicious firmware and achieve root RCE on the CI host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.0.1923< 22.0.843CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Application versionRun 'rpm -q vasion' or check the application version through the admin interface under System > AboutAffected if version is lower than 20.0.1923
-
Check Vasion Virtual Appliance Host versionRun 'hostnamectl' or check the underlying host system version, or look for VA version in the virtualization environmentAffected if host version is lower than 22.0.843
-
Verify jenkins sudo configurationRun 'sudo -l -U jenkins' and examine the output for NOPASSWD rules, or inspect /etc/sudoers and /etc/sudoers.d/ for 'jenkins' entries with NOPASSWDAffected if jenkins user has NOPASSWD sudo access for mount or umount commands
-
Check CI/CD build configuration for image pull settingsInspect CI/CD pipeline configuration files (Jenkinsfile, GitLab CI YAML, or similar) for docker pull or image deployment commands and verify if signature verification is implementedAffected if builds pull images without signature validation or from untrusted sources
-
Check for plain HTTP downloads in build or deployment scriptsSearch build scripts, deployment playbooks, and automation files for HTTP URLs (not HTTPS) related to VirtualBox Extension Pack or third-party software downloadsAffected if VirtualBox Extension Pack or other software is downloaded over HTTP without signature validation
Environment is affected if running Vasion Virtual Appliance Application below 20.0.1923 or Host below 22.0.843, AND the jenkins account has NOPASSWD sudo rules, AND builds pull unverified images or download software over plain HTTP.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.0.192322.0.843
Upgrade to version 22.0.843 (VA) or 20.0.1923 (Application), implement image signature verification, enforce HTTPS with signature validation for all downloads, and remove NOPASSWD sudo rules for the jenkins account.
Virtual Appliance Application: 20.0.1923 or later; Virtual Appliance Host: 22.0.843 or later
- Identify the current version of Virtual Appliance Application and Virtual Appliance Host currently deployed
- Upgrade the Virtual Appliance Application to version 20.0.1923 or later
- Upgrade the Virtual Appliance Host to version 22.0.843 or later
- After upgrading, verify that the CI/CD build pipeline no longer pulls unverified third-party images
- Verify that VirtualBox Extension Pack downloads now use secure channels with signature validation
- Confirm the jenkins account NOPASSWD permissions for mount/umount have been removed or properly restricted
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation10.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34212 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data